Please enable JavaScript in your browser to experience all features of our site.

Best Price Guarantee: Feel Great VIP! ALL Your VIP Benefits apply every day

Women's ASICS GEL-Nimbus VII

Asics® GEL-Nimbus VII®: Ultimate Cushioning, New Improved Fit.The pillow-soft feel and read more...
Item #ASC1025

Endangered

Reg: $79.99
VIP:$71.99Get This Price

[what's this?]

Make your selection: Loading ...

! Endangered Shoe [?]

Product Information:

Asics® GEL-Nimbus VII®: Ultimate Cushioning, New Improved Fit.

The pillow-soft feel and flexibility are just as addictive as ever. Guidance and superb performance still rule from heel to toe. And now, new open-air mesh creates a soft, slipper-like upper that teams with four more new improvements to the fit. New Duo-Sole forefoot is durable, yet light and responsive. New Space Trusstic System had added ridges for improved midfoot support. Newly updated Biomorphic Fit upper gives superior fit and function. PHF. (Personalized Heel Fit) molds to your heel. 11.4 ounces

Best for runners with a medium to large build and medium to high arches.

Category Type: NEUTRAL+ [?]
Neutral + shoes provides increased cushioning for maximum shock absorption. Determine your body frame by using this chart to get your perfect shoe.
Use this chart to determine your body frame and get your perfect shoe fit.

Specifications:

Shock Absorption: Heel|GEL|Forefoot|GEL
Toebox Width: Medium
Shoe Construction: Slip last
Midsole Material: Compression molded EVA
Outsole Material: Carbon rubber
Upper Material: Mesh|Synthetic leather


1.	Teresa rated this product 5 stars Tue, November 14,2006: A great training shoe. As an Ironman athlete who recently suffered a knee injury, I had to cut back on my training volume until I tried this shoe. Great cushioning and support -- a good training shoe for the high mileage runner.

2.	Kelley rated this product 4 stars Tue, June 06,2006: After having much success with the VI, I thought the VIIs would be just as good. They seem heavier on my feet but they are still much better than the Asics 2100s.

3.	RJ rated this product 5 stars Mon, June 05,2006: A great cushioning shoe. Cradles the foot and is pretty stable.

4.	Patrick rated this product 4 stars Mon, June 05,2006: Shoe provides great support for me (6'3", 210 lbs.). However I agree that the size in the Nimbus VII runs big. Go down a 1/2 size when ordering. This shoe runs bigger than the Nimbus VI.

5.	Kelly A rated this product 2 stars Tue, May 30,2006: I had previously run in the Asics Nimbus VI, which fit me very well. I got the VII's a few weeks ago and am sending them back - I had an 8.5 in the VI's, and that same size was too big in the VII's. The VII's also rubbed my little toe on my right foot only (defective shoe or design problem - I don't know). I did love the mesh toe box, though! I'm 5'6", 130lbs, have very high arches and run about 20 miles per week. I'm hoping the VIII's will fit me better and run truer to size.

6.	David Gettis rated this product 5 stars Tue, May 23,2006: Many people have complained about the fit of this shoe and heel pain and/or blistering. All I can say is that I've had no problems whatsoever. I think the key is sizing down a 1/2 size from what you normally wear. I usually run in 12 1/2 but had to get a 12 in these for the fit to be right. Also, shell out the $$$ for the Nimbus socks...they are so badass and I can't see how anyone would blister in them. Anyway, the cushioning of these shoes is SUPERB. In the past, I've had a lot of issues with shin splints and very sore calves. I've felt none of this with the Nimbus VII's. In addition, I feel a lot less sore overall with them the next day. Size down a 1/2 size and enjoy the ride on air.

7.	M. Weigel rated this product 5 stars Sun, May 14,2006: I've been running for 23 years, and this is the first shoe I've owned that felt perfect from right out of the box. Snug in the heal, but roomy in the toe box, super cushioning. Great for those who do lots of running on the road.

8.	behb rated this product 2 stars Thu, May 11,2006: I'm very sorry to report that these shoes gave me blisters under my large toe knuckles (ball of the foot). I've never blistered before (been running for >25 years) and am very disappointed that the Nimbus VII didn't work for me, but I think it must be the larger toebox. I've been buying shoes with maximum cushion to help with shin splints and knee problems (44 yrs old and 15-20 miles/week). I have, and love, the Nimbus VI and will try to find another pair on ebay. I probably put 40-50 miles on the Nimbus VIIs and finally swapped them away to a girlfriend. I hope they work for her. Bummer!!

9.	John rated this product 1 star Thu, May 04,2006: I've blistered in the heels with these shoes. Haven't done that before.

10.	rob rated this product 5 stars Tue, May 02,2006: Awesome shoes...buying my 5th or 6th pair...wide toebox with mesh all across the top relieved a big-toe hotspot with other shoes. Will run 3rd marathon later this month with these! Nervous though that Asics' website talks about the GEL Nimbus VIII coming out in Fall '06...I hate it when companies "update" a pair I finally find and love. We'll see!

11.	George rated this product 1 star Tue, May 02,2006: Blistered like crazy in heel ares. Terrible shoes.

12.	kip rated this product 3 stars Mon, May 01,2006: I've worn Nimbus for years and have been quite satisfied until I purchased my first pair of VIIs. I bought the same size as I always had but now the toebox is wider and the shoe is a bit longer than previous years' models (buying mail order can be a risk). Going down a half size from what I used to wear has seemed to help remedy those issues. With that, it's still my overall favorite cushioned shoe.

13.	Rebecca rated this product 5 stars Fri, April 28,2006: These shoes are wonderful! I trained for my half marathon in them and they held up beautifully.

14.	Amelia rated this product 5 stars Thu, April 27,2006: I'm a high school runner and spend lots of miles in my running shoes. I discovered the Nimbus early last season. After an a stress fracture in my ankle. I'm on my second pair now and just love them! Thank you Nimbus, youre so sweet to my feet!

15.	Dave rated this product 5 stars Mon, April 24,2006: Excellent shoe! I tried the NB1060 but continued to have metatarsel pain. The wide toe box and excellent gel cushion in the Nimbus are excellent. A new winner!!

16.	Will Drioen rated this product 5 stars Sun, April 23,2006: Got these a month ago after I started getting knee trouble with the N 992. These are great, very flexible in the toe. Cushioning is great; they can really take a beating. I.m 5'9 185 pounds with mid arches. When running my foot dose not move around inside at all, very secure. I have not gotten any blisters yet and I don.t expect I will. I would definitely buy again.

17.	Lisamarie rated this product 5 stars Wed, April 19,2006: Love these shoes right out of the box they were perfect. I'm medium build with high arch and need a flexible shoe.

18.	susan rated this product 5 stars Tue, April 18,2006: Not since 1998 have I been able to find a shoe I loved so much (the old Reebok DMX 10 pods!) I bought these shoes Wed. and raced in them out of the box for a Turkey Trot the next day and had my bext time in a 5K since running again. When those wore down I bought an identical pair (after a terrible bout with the Kinsei's--NO NO NO!) and again, stright out of the box and into a 10K, on a lot of concrete. That was a hard one--everything hurt--EXCEPT my feet.

19.	MaryKate rated this product 5 stars Mon, April 17,2006: I love these shoes i'm on my second pair and looking to buy my third. I love the looks of them and they fit great are comfortable, and i have never had any pain running with these shoes.

20.	BRT rated this product 3 stars Thu, April 06,2006: By the way, I am 5'8 136 lbs, medium to high arch, neutral

21.	Larry Appleton rated this product 3 stars Mon, April 03,2006: I've ran and walked in Kayano's for years before moving on to the new Nimbus VII. I'm a heavy person at 230 lbs. and find that I'm having problems with soreness on the balls of my feet after walking 3 to 4 miles. Great fit with plenty of custion in the heals. Going back to Kayanos!

22.	Gary O rated this product 5 stars Sun, April 02,2006: I love these shoes. I usally require a wide (4E) shoe, but these just mold to my feet and feel great. The cushioning makes it feel like you are running on air. I can't say enough good things about these shoes.

23.	rachel rated this product 4 stars Sat, March 25,2006: Excellent shoe! I have run in Kayanos and Hurricanes, for the price this one ranks right up there with them , but less expensive. Great soft ,support from heal to toe. I have turned 2 of my friends on to these and they love them also. Highly Recomended!

24.	JC rated this product 2 stars Mon, March 20,2006: I have been running in Nimbus shoes for the past four years until these replaced the VIs. Cushion is overbearing and makes the shoe feel loose and the fit (toebox) is now too wide for my liking.

25.	Matt rated this product 5 stars Sun, March 19,2006: Had my first run in these today. Very nice fit, excellent ride, and pain free.

26.	Stephanie rated this product 5 stars Sat, March 18,2006: I just purchased the Nimbus after reading that they were best for my foot type. I took a chance and I can say I am absolutely thrilled that I bought these. I just finished a race in them and my normally stiff knees are feeling fine. I think the gel cushioning is superb. I was initally concerned with the width of the toe box but it was no problem at all. The only thing I will say is that these are NOT cold weather running shoes...the upper is mesh.

27.	Brenda rated this product 1 star Tue, March 07,2006: Shoes look good but they wear terrible. I got blisters on my heel. The fabric is so rough at the heels. I have never gotten blisters with any running shoes before. Also, the gel in the right shoe was not in the correct place and it hit me under my toes. What pain I had. Sending shoes back.

28.	Judy rated this product 5 stars Mon, February 27,2006: So Far so good with these shoes. I do wear the extra RRS gel inserts with them and it seems to do the trick. I am a female, 155+ pounds and have a high arch. I also have a neutral gait(no under/over pronation.) These are the only shoes that don't make my feet fall asleep across the top of my foot. These shoes are roomy in the toe box, and snug but not too tight in the midfoot. I run 6-15 miles a week and have been running in these since January. I have tried Mizuno, Creation 6, Nirvana and the Aisics Gel GTS-2090. I have also tried the Adidas Supernova Control. I like these the best so far. The cushioning is terrific. I have no pain during or after my runs. I also had trouble with a stress fracture in my medial maleolis but these shoes have not given me any problems with that. I'm not sure it's the actual shoe or the insoles but don't really care. They're working for me.

29.	Jeffrey rated this product 5 stars Wed, February 22,2006: Love this shoe, nice size toe box, makes going long a breeze

30.	madmike rated this product 5 stars Wed, February 22,2006: As a 6'5'', 230lb cancer surviving US Marine, these are the best shoes I've found. I did a marathon in them last month and the only part of my body that didn't hurt was my feet. The cushioning and stability is perfect for us clydsdale-types.

31.	Josh rated this product 1 star Tue, February 21,2006: I have been running in the NIKE MILER for the last year and have been happy but was looking for the same performance with more durablitiy. these had good heel fore foot cushioning how ever they gave me shin splints in a matter of 5 miles, i took them back

32.	Scott rated this product 4 stars Mon, February 13,2006: Have had these shoes on a 5 mile tempo run and a 16 mile slow run and no blisters or hot spots. Excellent cushioning on asphalt, a little bit too much cushioning on trails.

33.	jenny rated this product 5 stars Mon, February 13,2006: These are so much better, technically, than the Nimbus 6! The structure and cushioning makes my feet feel centered, unlike the 6, and the fit is exactly what I need; more narrow at the heels and wider at the toes. It took me a long time to try the Nimbus again, so I hope that when the 8 comes out, the design is similar to this one.

34.	Barry rated this product 5 stars Sat, February 11,2006: Have been a New Balance runner for over 25 years. This is my first pair of Asics and I am very well pleased. A little heavy, but very comfortable from the first run. I have raced in them and I guess the comfort trumps the weight since I ran my best 10K ever. 6'3", 165 lb, 30 mpw. Great shoe.

35.	Blade rated this product 5 stars Fri, February 10,2006: Forgot to post rating, Five!

36.	ellie rated this product 5 stars Thu, February 09,2006: I'm on my second pair of Nimbus 7s, and my experiences have been good. They're very well cushioned, and soft without feeling like marshmallows (like the Cumulus).

37.	Kyle rated this product 5 stars Sun, February 05,2006: This shoe works great for me. I tried sever models and brands after they stopped making my favorite shoe. This replacement ended up an improvement. I have trined an average of 25 to 30 miles a week for the last 5 months with several half marathons in the same shoe. Its still going strong. Very durable.

38.	Dan Bonano rated this product 5 stars Tue, January 31,2006: 6'1", 185lbs, 25-30 miles/week, 8-min. pace. I have been wearing the Nimbus for over 3 years - going through 3 to 4 pairs/year. The new VII does seem to have more cushion but I have not had any of the negative effects other reviewers have complained of. Although the heel cup seems stiffer, the fit and feel are still good. I do wear orthodics so any lack of support would not impact me. My only complaint on this shoe is the price - but since I got them on sale and used a $10-off coupon, I got them for $90 which seems much more reasonable than $115 to $120. The mesh certainly works well because my feet get cold on winter runs!

39.	David rated this product 5 stars Thu, January 26,2006: These shoes fit like they were custom-made for my feet. A smooth cushioned ride that works well in alternation with Mizuno Wave Rider 8s. Not sure the Nimbus can hold up for long runs (10 miles or more) but they are great for shorter runs and speedwork.

40.	Edward rated this product 5 stars Thu, January 26,2006: Third pair of Nimbus shoes I have had. Before this I wore the Asics Landreth (2 pair)but found them a little lacking in cushioning. The Nimbus VII is perfect for me. No blistering, cushioning where I need it. If you don't need motion control and supinate this shoe has been great.

41.	Bill rated this product 1 star Sat, January 21,2006: I,ve tried every damn lacing system with these shoes and they still give me blisters. They need to be redesigned, period!!!! $120 for blisters is terrible.

42.	Tammie rated this product 5 stars Sat, January 21,2006: These are excellent shoes. I have run 2 marathons, 1/2 marathons, and hundreds of miles in them and they are excellent. I use the lace loop lock system and have never had a blister anywhere. This is the only shoe I have ever worn where I have not had one blister. They are also the most durable shoe I have ever worn. I have worn two pairs of this shoe for a year now.

43.	William Varley rated this product 5 stars Fri, January 20,2006: I have used these for a while now and did find there was a lot of room in the heal area (yet was right size). However, if you do loop-lacing locks at the top, this stops and they are right as rain. Supremely comfortable and nice room in toe box. Good for neutral runners with solid arches. All I can say is try lacing a shoe differently before you slate it - it's surprising what a difference it makes.

44.	Craig rated this product 1 star Fri, January 20,2006: Thought I was the only crazy one with heel blisters until I read the posts. At least I'm still sane.

45.	Dean rated this product 1 star Fri, January 20,2006: Tried these based on friends' recommendations. Just not for me-heel blisters the size of silver dollars. A little sticker shock too-$120 for a shoe that causes blisters doesn't impress me at all.

46.	Teresa rated this product 4 stars Wed, January 18,2006: I have been running on the Nimbus models for the past three years. The GT's wear out too quickly. I am 5'10," 140 lbs and need something durable with a lot of cusion. I used to get stress fractures but no more. Run about 40 miles/week on pavement and 3-4 half marathons per year. They will blister if you wear the wrong socks, and I needed a few runs to break the arch in, as it is pretty high. Otherwise, a great shoe for a the larger, long-distance runner.

47.	Teresa rated this product 4 stars Wed, January 18,2006: I have been running on the Nimbus models for the past three years. The GT's wear out too quickly. I am 5'10," 140 lbs and need something durable with a lot of cusion. I used to get stress fractures but no more. Run about 40 miles/week on pavement and 3-4 half marathons per year. They will blister if you wear the wrong socks, and I needed a few runs to break the arch in, as it is pretty high. Otherwise, a great shoe for a the larger, long-distance runner.

48.	Anne rated this product 5 stars Wed, January 11,2006: I run 6-10 miles a day, 6 days a week and I love these shoes. They are extremely comfortable and offer good support. I have only had them for about a month and a half, but I haven't had any problems and like them more than the Brooks GTS, which I usually wear. I highly recommend these shoes.

49.	Jose Pujol rated this product 5 stars Wed, January 11,2006: Excellent running shoes. I really need cushioning after two knee surgeries. These shoes provide it.

50.	Bob rated this product 1 star Tue, January 10,2006: These shoes are expensive and I didn't like them. I developed blisters in my heels and knee pain. ASICs can do a better job.

51.	Harry rated this product 1 star Sun, January 08,2006: I have run in various Asics models during the last 10 years. Tried the VIIs, they're ok but nothing spectacular for the price. I'm going back to the 2100 series. Cheaper and just as good.

52.	Dennis rated this product 5 stars Fri, January 06,2006: Very nice shoe. I enjoyed the spirited negative comments from some but this is a nice shoe for someone needing cushioning. It fits better than the VI too. I run mostly trails and it works for them too. The lack of color choices is the most negative thing I have to say. Run!!

53.	Stan rated this product 1 star Fri, January 06,2006: I liked them at first. After 150 miles, shoes were worn out. That's about 50 cents per mile run. Too pricey!!!

54.	Jay rated this product 1 star Fri, January 06,2006: Worn Nimbus' for years. Sent back Viis. Heel slippage and blisters, less cushion, and frankly, the price increase puts them out of the price range for me.

55.	Rob rated this product 5 stars Tue, January 03,2006: I'm about to purchase my 4th pair of Asics GEL Nimbus VII. In 2005 I also ran in Adistar Cushion, Mizuno Wave Creation 6, and Brooks Epiphany 2...but none gave me same level of comfort as Nimbus VII. Pros: Fit great right out of the box, no break-in period, awesome room in toebox (no more squeezed-toe pain), overall fabulous feel. Cons: laces are a little too short and the shoes feel like they're passing their prime at 220-250 miles (which means they cost me ~$.50/mile). My history: I'm training about 30-35 mi/wk; ING Miami '06 will be my third 26.2. I'm neutral pronator, med/heavy build, normal arches, heel-striker. I have zero heel slippage using the "Heel Slippage" lacing trick on this website under "Running Information" "Shoe Fit Tips" tab. No blisters, but I wear WrightSox--never blisterd in any shoe. Also, short laces may only be caused because I don't like tightly laced shoes; if it were an issue, I'd just buy longer laces.

56.	Heather G. rated this product 5 stars Tue, January 03,2006: This is my second pair of Nimbus and I like them much more than my first pair. I am not a professional runner, definitely not a marathon-er, I simply jog because it's good for me and I need to lose a little weight. I need the cushion that the Nimbus offers. I am VERY pleased with my VII! They fit great on the first run in them! Excellent shoe.

57.	Sean rated this product 1 star Sat, December 31,2005: Got a pair for Christmas; blistered in heel; back they go to RRS.

58.	George rated this product 1 star Thu, December 29,2005: Tried them after reading posts here. For the first week, these were outstanding. Then I got heel blisters. Back they went to RRS.

59.	Cassie rated this product 3 stars Mon, December 19,2005: They feel great for my legs (no injuries or knee problems) but my feet don't like them that well. They pinch the top of my foot, I have high arches, and asics shoe laces are always too short. Also a bit chunky, they could be a little lighter and smoother feeling on the transition. More importantly however my legs aren't getting injured so thats a plus.

60.	Barry Brogdon rated this product 4 stars Sat, December 17,2005: This is my first pair of Asics. It has exactly what I am looking for in a pair of shoes and had found in New Balance for years. I want a cushioned shoe without a lot of stability. The toe box is roomy and does not cramp my forefoot. I have used them for speed work, long training runs, and have raced in them from 5K to half marathon. I am rotating them with two pair of New Balance that I still have and find myself picking the Asics more and more. I have just bought a pair of 1060 New Balance that I hope will give me the performance of the Nimbus. My only hold-back from giving them a 5 star is I want to see what kind of mileage I get out of them (approximately 200 miles so far and no wear problems). All in all, a very good shoe.

61.	Jon W. rated this product 1 star Tue, December 13,2005: I have run in these shoes off and on for 3 months now. I have to say that they are NOT what they are cracked up to be. The shoe runs at least 1/2 size larger all the around than the VI's. The toe box is too large. When running on trails or courses with a lot of turns you get slippage in the toe box. Also, when you lace them down to make up for larger toe box, it creates a pressure point at the base, on top of your toes. My first 5K run resulted in a toe that had the skin rubbed off...even through cushioned socks. Does anyone know where I can find a pair of VI's??

62.	Terry Davis rated this product 5 stars Tue, December 13,2005: This is my first pair of Asics. After years of running in Nike shoes, I have given up on Nike and the whole Shox concept. Running in these shoes makes me remember why I like to run. They are great -- lightweight, great fit and outstanding cushioning. Plus, they are responsive enough for some serious speed work. 5 Stars!!!

63.	Scott rated this product 1 star Mon, December 12,2005: Don't like te VIIs. Caused blisters with heel slippage. Pretty pricey too.

64.	Frank rated this product 4 stars Tue, December 06,2005: On initial try-on, this is the softest, most comfortable shoe you can buy. However, my experience with the shoe is that it feels heavy and a bit clunky once you break it in and compare it to other cushioned shoes. I know that there are Nimbus die-hards out there. The shoe is just not as functional as my first impression of it would lead me to believe.

65.	Jason P rated this product 5 stars Mon, December 05,2005: M, 5'11, 165 lbs, 25-35 miles/week, neutral runner. Great fit and nice cushioning. Used for my last marathon (4:15) and had not problems with them or my feet. Rather pricey, hope to find a shoe that works as well at a more reasonable cost. Ordering another pair along with a Landreth II to compare.

66.	Bob rated this product 1 star Wed, November 30,2005: Bad shoe. Feel inside the heel and there's a horizontal ridge across it half way up. No surprise it gives you blisters. Dumb design !

67.	billr rated this product 4 stars Tue, November 29,2005: Have likes the Nimbus line for years but, to me, the VI was unsuitable for running. Hesitated in trying the VII but did because of the return policy. I like my VIIs and feel ASICS has corrected whatever they got wrong on the VI.

68.	Bob rated this product 2 stars Sun, November 27,2005: Originally posted as a 5-star shoe. After a couple of hundred miles - downgrading the shoe. Loved the the VI's and expected more from these. Sized down a 1/2 size as recommended and I float in them now. Never had a blister problem but the shoe has felt clunky - not responsive like the VI's. Cushioning is great but the fit and $$$ will likely push me to another shoe.

69.	Henrique rated this product 5 stars Fri, November 18,2005: Very good for training

70.	Lisa rated this product 3 stars Tue, November 15,2005: Not an improvement compared to Nimbus VI: I experienced heel slippage even though more coverage in heel (not a plus). Also felt more cushion in forefoot and too snug in arch area. Still a nice roomy toebox. Too much shoe material. (I have a high arch and a neutral to underpronator).

71.	J. Davis rated this product 5 stars Mon, November 14,2005: I love this shoe....Just made the change from the Nimbus VI and this shoe is great. 100 miles on my new pair...could not fit better....Just completed my last long run (22 miles)for the Rocket City Marathon...and this shoe keeps getting better each day...

72.	Dave R rated this product 2 stars Sun, November 13,2005: Never had blisters before. With these I have been having problems. I have about 100 miles on them. I run 15-20 miles a week. Looking for somthing new.

73.	GregD rated this product 5 stars Sat, November 12,2005: Just finished training and running a marathon in the Nimbus. Great ride, cushioning, and performance. My new favorite shoe.

74.	Susan rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: The improvement to the VII is the fit and look.

75.	Lyvia rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: I've been running for over ten years and these are the best shoes I've ever had.

76.	Jefferson rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: I like these shoes.

77.	Samantha rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: The most comfortable shoe I.ve ever owned

78.	Thomas rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: I.m going back for a second pair.

79.	Arthur rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: I have never been so satisfied with a running shoe in my life, never.

80.	Rafael rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: I can.t complain as others have. I.ve been satisfied so far

81.	cesar rated this product 5 stars Thu, November 10,2005: This is the BEST RUNNING shoe I have ever owned.

82.	Dave A. rated this product 5 stars Sat, November 05,2005: OK, I forgot to rate them. I think it's an excellent shoe, and a real improvement over prior models, and least for my feet.

83.	Foreigner rated this product 5 stars Sat, November 05,2005: If you cant run cause youre size dont blame the shoe please. Best shoe I ever run on.

84.	Michael R. Wright rated this product 5 stars Wed, November 02,2005: I'm a ironman distance triathlete who places a lot of miles on this 6'1" 168-170 lb frame and the GEL Nimbus VII is an awesome shoe, that has a lot of cushion that makes running many miles a lot of fun for me and my happy ten toes.

85.	Michael R. Wright rated this product 5 stars Wed, November 02,2005: I'm a ironman distance triathlete who places a lot of miles on this 6'1" 168-170 lb frame and the GEL Nimbus VII is an awesome shoe, that has a lot of cushion that makes running many miles a lot of fun for me and my happy ten toes.

86.	Michael R. Wright rated this product 5 stars Wed, November 02,2005: I'm a ironman distance triathlete who places a lot of miles on this 6'1" 168-170 lb frame and the GEL Nimbus VII is an awesome shoe, that has a lot of cushion that makes running many miles a lot of fun for me and my happy ten toes.

87.	matt rated this product 5 stars Sun, October 30,2005: great shoe have 2 pair one with 350 and one that i just bought the best shoe i have ever ran in (i run 40+ a week)

88.	Bob rated this product 1 star Wed, October 19,2005: 6' 193 Neutral to underpronater, high arch. Like most others, I was a heavy user of the Nimbus and liked the Iv, V and VI's. I cannot fit my foot with the VII - either too long or too short. Don't have the heal problems others talk about but the shoe feels too mushy in the forefoot for long runs. They feel good for short runs and walking around but are not as promised. I do recommend VIP RRS status for you can return shoes that are not what they claim to be unlike others.

89.	Rodney rated this product 1 star Tue, October 18,2005: These are my first big disappointment with an ASICs shoe. I feel like I've been ripped off big time; at $120 which is a very big price; I expected so much more than what are really $49.99 shoes. Way to go ASICs.

90.	Jimbo rated this product 1 star Mon, October 17,2005: From below, forgot to rate.

91.	Mark rated this product 1 star Mon, October 17,2005: Poorly designed shoe. Gave me blisters and knee pain. Plus I'm out $120. Too much money for the poor quality.

92.	Bob rated this product 1 star Sun, October 16,2005: Dreadful shoe. Wore the VI (2 pairs) very successfully; this gave me blisters and lots of pain. Not using Asics now - gone to the Mizuno Creation which is fantastic. The new Nimbus is a foot wrecker.

93.	George rated this product 1 star Sun, October 16,2005: Asics didn't do a quality effort on these VIIs. Very unhappy.

94.	Nate rated this product 5 stars Sat, October 15,2005: Great Shoes!

95.	Steve rated this product 1 star Thu, October 13,2005: Very unhappy; high price, less comfort, poorer fit compared to VIs. Heel counter blistered my heels. Asics, you missed the mark on this edition of Nimbus.

96.	JBK rated this product 2 stars Tue, October 11,2005: An avid purchaser of the Nimbus, the new VII is a huge disappointment. Size down by half size from previous models and the shoe still fits badly. Its a redeigned heel area to blame..very wide and poor support. Yes the cushioning still great, but am for the first time in many years looking for to move away from Nimbus.

97.	DJ rated this product 5 stars Thu, October 06,2005: This is the BEST RUNNING shoe I have ever owned. Please tell me where I can find size 15 and I will buy many more sets!!!!!!

98.	L May rated this product 1 star Mon, October 03,2005: I loved the orange Nimbus VI shoes; they were flexible yet cushiony. As soon as I put them on, I felt I had the perfect shoe. Of course, that was the only pair of Nimbus VIs I've ever been able to buy, and I've ended up with some VIIs. After a couple of months in the VIIs, I have severe Achilles soreness, most likely due to the extra high heel counter and the fact that they just aren't very flexible. When you're a forefoot striker, you need a shoe that won't fight your foot. Also, I seem to stumble and scuff my toes a lot in them, though they don't seem any roomier than the VIs. This could also be due to the stiffness.

99.	John rated this product 4 stars Fri, September 30,2005: I can't complain as others have. I've been satisfied so far.

100.	Dustin rated this product 2 stars Tue, September 27,2005: I was a huge fan of the Nimbus VI. I went through two pairs and used them to train for a great marathon. Naturally, I was eager to try the improved fit of the VII's. I couldn't be more disappointed. I personally feel they made the fit too sloppy which just makes the shoe feel incredibly cumbersome. My feet didn't blister but I have noticed the ankle pain others have mentioned. Mine are not worn out, but I need something else. I hate running in them.

101.	cassie rated this product 1 star Fri, September 23,2005: wore down on the lateral sides way too quickly--65 miles--and were too expensive to have this kind of wear

102.	Doug Jesseph rated this product 2 stars Fri, September 23,2005: I've always had good luck with ASICS, until now. These felt great @ first, but after 100 miles I was ready for something else. The heel fit became sloppy , and when I tried to lock the laces to tighten up the heel, I began to get soreness in the left ankle. For the money, a pretty serious disapointment.

103.	Jan rated this product 2 stars Mon, September 19,2005: Sloppy fit, very heavy shoe, sacrificed support for cushion, this was a very disappointing shoe, especially given the price. Wore twice, gave to Salvation Army.

104.	carolyn rated this product 5 stars Mon, September 19,2005: My first pair of Nimbus VIIs and I LOVE them. Am training for a marathon after recovering from multiple foot and ankle injuries -- which I think were all part of my bad experience with ASICs Evolution (WORST shoes EVER!). VIIs are like running on air -- even after 15+ miles.

105.	Jerreld rated this product 1 star Fri, September 16,2005: Wow, never seen so many up and down comments on the same shoes. What gives, man. You either like them or hate them. I don't like them. Too expensive and not comfortable plus I got blisters and ain't never got those things before with any shoes.

106.	Danny rated this product 1 star Thu, September 15,2005: The Nimbus VIIs don't do it for me. High price, uncomfortable and so-so cushioning. I appreciate the comments from people happy with them. Keep on running!!!

107.	james rated this product 5 stars Thu, September 15,2005: Interesting to see the other negative comments on this shoe... I've traditionally used Saucony and some Addidas models but I must say, right out of the box, this shoe is the best I've run in... perfect.

108.	Darvon rated this product 1 star Tue, September 13,2005: Tried them, blistered sent them back for refund. Nuf said, man.

109.	Byron rated this product 1 star Tue, September 13,2005: I wish I had the successes with the VIIs others had. They're not the right shoes for my feet. Had great sucess with prior Nimbus' but these don't do it.

110.	Jim rated this product 1 star Mon, September 12,2005: If you liked the VI's, you'll like these too. Don't let the negative commnents influence you. I'm a longtime Nimbus runner...these shoes are fine.

111.	Demetrius rated this product 1 star Mon, September 12,2005: These ain't for me, man.When this dude pays $120, he wants comfort. Heel blisters ain't no comfort. Later!

112.	Kavron rated this product 1 star Sat, September 10,2005: I run 50+/week. Straines patellar tendon with these shoes. Don't buy them ,for the price they are terrible.

113.	Benjy rated this product 1 star Fri, September 09,2005: Just finished an early autumn 10 miler. I usually don't post any comments but want to on the VIIs. Yes, the heel blisters started in my 5th run in the shoes. I gritted through them and now the shoes seem ok. I just don't trust these shoes the way I did with other ASICs products. I may or may not buy another pair because I have no loyalty to these shoes like runners usually have for a certain make and model. My opinion of ASICs certainly went down though. Times are tough and a $120 price for just so-so shoes is way too steep.

114.	Go Tigers! rated this product 5 stars Fri, September 09,2005: Have only run approx. 4 times for a total of 12 miles in these shoes and so far no problems-great cushioning for a 200 pounder-heel box does seem a little roomy and loose, but no blisters so far-use an anti-slip lacing technique.

115.	Rasheed rated this product 1 star Fri, September 09,2005: These shoes are just okay. Nothing great, nothing bad. Didn't blister in them, but did get some hot spots on bottoms of feet. I've worn lots of shoes and I would recommend people try other brands/models before paying $120 for these. I think you can get the same comfort at a much lower price.

116.	Darryl rated this product 1 star Thu, September 08,2005: I'm a marathoner. Don't know where to start on my Viis shortcomings. Heel blisters, general lack of comfort, etc. Best summed up as a lack of trust in this ASICs product. ASICs usually does a good job on their shoes. For me, they simply missed the mark on this edition of the Nimbus.

117.	jane andraka rated this product 5 stars Thu, September 08,2005: forgot to rate!

118.	Brett rated this product 1 star Wed, September 07,2005: Thought these VIIs would be like the amazing VIs. Wrong!! Just can't run in these without discomfort, blisters and ankle pain.

119.	Jeff Wilcox rated this product 5 stars Wed, September 07,2005: Just got back into running - the first 2 people I talked to recommended the Asics Gel Nimbus, so I spoke with 2 shoe experts at sporting goods stores. They both highly recommended this shoe. I've done 3 triathlons and the training for them in my Gel Nimbus and LOVE these shoes!

120.	Louis rated this product 1 star Tue, September 06,2005: These shoes are not for me. Saw the posts, tried them, blistered and sent them back.

121.	Mike rated this product 5 stars Tue, September 06,2005: Forgot to rate them.

122.	John rated this product 5 stars Mon, September 05,2005: I was leery about buying these after reading some of the reviews, but I have to say I like them better than my VI's. Ran a 20 in them yesterday for marathon training. No problems. Only recommendation is to buy 1/2 size smaller than the Nimbus VI.

123.	Terrell rated this product 1 star Mon, September 05,2005: Would rather run barefoot.

124.	Jeannette rated this product 5 stars Mon, September 05,2005: Forgot to rate.

125.	Dwayne rated this product 1 star Mon, September 05,2005: What a mistake. No durability, soles gone at 135 miles and blisters on both heels.

126.	Darren rated this product 1 star Sun, September 04,2005: Just sent thses back for a refund. Been running 50= a week for 15 years. Ran 10 in these, blistered and walked home. ASICs screw your corporate greed.

127.	Dwayne rated this product 1 star Sun, September 04,2005: Don't waste $120. Send that money to Katrina relief. These are horrible, way overpriced shoes. I'd not pay $9.99 for these rejects.

128.	Tyrone rated this product 1 star Sun, September 04,2005: Just lousy shoes. I thought $120 would bring running comfort, not discomfort.

129.	Sol rated this product 1 star Fri, September 02,2005: ASICs, you laid a goose egg on these shoes. I've faithfully worn your brand for many years until now. I got heel blisters in my first 100 miles. Shame on you for the discomfort, pain and the $120 hit on my Jewish wallet. I should have donated the money to Hurricane Katrina relief.

130.	Dave rated this product 5 stars Wed, August 31,2005: I have had no problems with these shoes and have put a fair amount of miles on them. No blisters on any of my runs. I like them better than the VI's.

131.	Sonny rated this product 1 star Wed, August 31,2005: Bad quality and ,yes ,blisters.

132.	DAVISJM rated this product 4 stars Wed, August 31,2005: Forgot to rate.

133.	WallyRandolph rated this product 1 star Tue, August 30,2005: Wore the VIs and really liked their ride, comfort and durability. The VIIs are not that way at all. Why did asics mess around with a winner? Reminds me of the old saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

134.	Alex Davis rated this product 1 star Mon, August 29,2005: I loved the Nimbus VI, purchased the Nimbus VII last week and have regretted it ever since.

135.	Jamie rated this product 1 star Sun, August 28,2005: For the first 2 weeks, I rated them 5 stars. Then all of a sudden the blistering began.

136.	Nicki rated this product 1 star Sat, August 27,2005: What a disaster!Five miles in my fifth run the heel blisters started and never ended. Thank God for my backup pair of new balances for following runs.

137.	Ski rated this product 1 star Sat, August 27,2005: I laughed at these bad reviews and thought these people were wrong. Guess what? They're right. These VIIs are the absolute worst I have ever run in. I'll spare you the details.

138.	George rated this product 1 star Sat, August 27,2005: Just finished my first beach run in these VIIs. I'm returning them; they're not the same level of quality I'm used to with ASICs shoes-and the 120 price is obscene.

139.	Josh rated this product 1 star Fri, August 26,2005: Boy, did I make a mistake. Runners, don't buy these shoes. You'll be sorry for a host of reasons; blisters, knee pain etc.

140.	Byron rated this product 1 star Fri, August 26,2005: I'm really choosy about running shoes. I thought for $120 I'd get top of the line quality, support and cushioning as well as durability--about 300 miles or more. Here's the results; durability-sole wearout at 156 miles. Cushioning-great. Support-non existent. Quality-heel blisters. Off to Mizuno for better shoes.

141.	Jimmy rated this product 1 star Thu, August 25,2005: I cannot be any more accurate than all these other reports. For $120 I expected smooth, comfortable running. All I got were blisters. Thanks, ASICs for your wonderful support.

142.	Dean rated this product 1 star Thu, August 25,2005: ASICs, you numbskulls!!!! Do your reps give you all this bad feedback or are you like all other companies who cannot or willnot reverse direction when you have a crappy product. Get with the program and fix the Nimbus VIIs or lose a whole lot of runners. By the way I ran less than 1 damn mile before heel blisters started. And I usually run 10 a day. ASICs you are run by morons.

143.	Rob rated this product 1 star Thu, August 25,2005: Read the reviews and scoffed at those reporting blisters and put it down to people jumping on a bandwagon to knock down the premier running company. Ordered my Nimbus 7s to replace my much loved Nimbus 6s, went for a gently 4 miles to wear them in and (you guessed it), heel blisters. If you check inside the heel there seems to be a raised ridge where the padding joins the heel counter. Guess if your heel is shaped the wrong way (as many peoples' seem to be) then this rubs and you blister. Loved the shoe in every other way so really disappointed to have to look for a replacement.

144.	Chuck rated this product 1 star Thu, August 25,2005: Worst shoes ever for the price. Heel blisters galore, little durability and wow $120. Is ASICs crazy????

145.	Harry rated this product 1 star Wed, August 24,2005: Don't pay $120 for these rejects. I wore Nimbus' faithfully until the VIIs. Got heel blisters and medial knee pain after 3 runs. Off I go to New Balance.

146.	marle rated this product 5 stars Wed, August 24,2005: What's not to love? This is an awesome shoe. I'm on my way to buy a new pair. This shoe provides great cushioning from toe to heel. The forefoot cushioning is generous and extremely responsive. The toebox is both roomy and incredibly breathable. I'm a medium-light weight runner who slightly under pronates, this shoe got me out a rut and has given me the protection I need to increase the speed of my runs. Cheers.

147.	Mark rated this product 5 stars Tue, August 23,2005: I have over a 150 miles on this shoe and it is still holding up great. Have had no blister issues whatsoeever. As a mild underpronator this is the most comfortable shoe I have ever worn. From the looks of the other reviews I'm one of the lucky ones. 35 miles per week / 170 lbs.

148.	Iron Turtle rated this product 5 stars Tue, August 23,2005: These have been the only shoes that haven't tortured my feet in quite a while! I was running in Kantaras and Nike did the same thing - the "Kantara II" was a completely different shoe! Nothing like the original! So I feel for all the old Nimbus fans who are disappointed with this latest model! But, I've tried every cushioned shoe from every manufacturer and so far these have been outstanding! I just ordered my second pair! I am 5'9", 195lbs, about 30+ miles per week-increasing for Fall marathon training. High arches, neutral gait, and lotsa feet issues! Just did 13 this past Saturday - no blisters, no plantar fascia pain, no neuroma pain! And believe me, my feet are beat to hell! I agree totally that these shoes have very little support, but the cushioning is tops - stick a pair of inner soles in 'em. That does the trick! If you've tried all the rest, get the VIP membership to be safe and give these a try!

149.	sixdonuts rated this product 1 star Tue, August 23,2005: Where is the arch support in this shoe? This shoe definately should not be recommended for medium to high arch runners. Agree w/ Mr. Ryland totaly. VI's were perfect these are horrible. Made sure to size down as suggested but after only a month the heel fabric has already worn through. VI's lasted 6+ months!

150.	Marathon Mick rated this product 1 star Mon, August 22,2005: I'll admit I was skeptical about the negative posts for blisters and tread wearout at 100+ miles. I believe now. Run 70+ each week. Took the VIIs for a 20 miler on Sunday, started blistering at 15 mile mark and actually ran the last 5 beach miles barefoot. Really wanted to toss these darn shoes in the Pacific but I want my money back from the RRS VIP return program. If ASICs ever again wants my business they better take these shoes off the market and totally revamp the VIII model to eliminate the blisters.

151.	Nate rated this product 1 star Mon, August 22,2005: $120 for heel blisters and only 100 miles before outer sole wearout. Does ASICs consider this brother a fool????

152.	Mr. Ryland rated this product 1 star Mon, August 22,2005: Pro: I love the ride; incredible. The heel-toe transition very smooth. This seems to set Asics above the compition. Con: This is supposed to be one of Asics' best shoes, but midway through my second run the lateral side of the left heel started rubbing my foot. The pain grew more intense as I ran the 5 miles back home. I don't know what happened, but the heel felt like it collapsed a little on that side. Now I cannot run in the shoe or I will get a killer blister. Not to mention, I noticed tread wear after two runs. I am 5'7", 145 lbs. and run 10 miles most days. These are supposed to be Asics' beefiest cushioned shoe. What's the deal?

153.	Joe rated this product 1 star Sun, August 21,2005: I'm in my 70s and, yes ,continue to run, although at a much slower pace. As a graybeard, my running goes way back to the days of jogging in the old converse sneakers. So I have seen and tried hundreds of running shoes. The bottom line is today's shoes are higher priced and wear out a whole lot faster than shoes made 20 years ago. I used to pay $60 for shoes and get 700-800 miles from them. Today I'm paying over $100 and getting 300 miles. Doesn't take long to figure out why. The shoe companies are sticking it to us big time. The Nimbus VIIs are a classic example. Priced at $120, they're poor quality for the price. I got 300 miles from the VIs and no blisters. I got 125 miles and lots of heel and toe blisters from the VIIs. My last blisters from shoes were in the 1950s from a pair of $5 converses.

154.	Becky rated this product 1 star Sat, August 20,2005: Forgot my single star! They get the star for appearance- nothing else!

155.	Owen rated this product 1 star Sat, August 20,2005: These shoes aren't for me; heel blisters. When paying more than $100 for shoes, I certainly expected a better quality product.

156.	Bob rated this product 5 stars Sat, August 20,2005: For me, a great shoe. Superb fit and cushioning. I can understand the comments about blisters though - I haven't had any (yet) but can feel slight hotspots on the outside of my heel when I run. Planning to run them in on shorter runs so hopefully avoid problems. May re-post with less stars if problems develop !

157.	Lance rated this product 1 star Fri, August 19,2005: I just cannot believe the polarity on these shoe comments---you either love them or hate them. Shouldn't be that way when the shoes cost over $100. I'm not spending any of my money on them after reading these posts.

158.	DaveB rated this product 5 stars Fri, August 19,2005: These are the most comfortable running shoes I've ever owned (in over 30 years of running). Notwithstanding all the other comments, I haven't had a single blister. The wider forefoot is great for me. I've run in every Nimbus since the III. I thought the VI was great, but the VII, at least for me, is a huge improvement.

159.	Luke rated this product 1 star Thu, August 18,2005: Have worn Nimbus since God knows when. Wear out a pair, get a new pair. The VIIs are horrible. Blisterd on first pair, exchanged them, no blisters. Third pair blisters again. Reurned them. Fourth pair blisterd like crazy. Averaging only 200 miles per pair prior to sole wearout. For $120, I got screwed royally.

160.	Jack rated this product 1 star Thu, August 18,2005: Horrible Shoes! Blisters galore on heels, forefoot and toes. I wore through the outer sole in 100 miles and, to top in off, the shoe laces broke the 10th time I laced up. Sure am glad I can return them to RRS.

161.	Dean rated this product 1 star Wed, August 17,2005: ASICS, I have worn your shoes faithfully for many years; kinda like a marriage. The VIIs are junk; blister heaven, man. Get your rocket scientists to figure out what is wrong. I love running but not with heel blisters the size of silver dollars. Later!!!

162.	Andy rated this product 1 star Tue, August 16,2005: 60 years old-30 per week; tried these-terribly unhappy-never blistered until now---paid 120 bucks; that's totally outrageous. Feel like I've been totally you know what by my former Asics friends.

163.	Ben Read rated this product 1 star Tue, August 16,2005: I have run on every iteration of the Gel Nimbus since 2001. This latest iteration leaves me with blisters on the heel and toe even after 100+ miles of use. Very disappointing. Can we have the last version back please?

164.	George rated this product 1 star Mon, August 15,2005: Read all the posts on blisters. Thought, I never blister so these are the shoes for me. WRONG!!!! I now have 3 really good looking blisters thanks to our friends at Asics. Bye, bye Asics; hello Mizuno.

165.	Brett rated this product 1 star Mon, August 15,2005: If I wanted blisters, I'd run barefoot. I certainly don't like paying $120 for similar results.

166.	Stephen Willhoite rated this product 1 star Mon, August 15,2005: Forgot to rate... Sorry

167.	Mike M rated this product 4 stars Sun, August 14,2005: I have been running in ACIS for since 1980, and have changed shoes as often as ACIS has upgraded. I have never run in Nimbus until this race season, and I have never run in a more comfortable, cushioned pair of shoes. I usually compensate with thick thorlos, but these required no "extra" padding - they're great. Bought by 2nd pair for my rotation today.

168.	Pete rated this product 5 stars Sun, August 14,2005: I liked the VI, and the VII is even better-VI's were spent at 350m These are wide enough for my slightly wide foot, while Creations were not.

169.	Billy rated this product 1 star Sun, August 14,2005: These shoes don't do anything for me. Blistered on third run. Have a big problem paying triple digit dollars for unsatisfactory shoes.

170.	Sean K rated this product 5 stars Sat, August 13,2005: These shoes are the best I have ever had. Most people get stability confused with cushioning. It has a maximum amount of cushioning with low stability, which is perfest for more leight weight runners seeking a stable ride. I beleive these shoes are awesome and are great for certain runners. I really love them and would suggest them to any runner of any experience level.

171.	Bob rated this product 1 star Sat, August 13,2005: Paid $120 for these shoes. Heel blisters, knee pain, no great cushioning, etc. Wow what a piece of junk I was sold.

172.	Jes rated this product 2 stars Fri, August 12,2005: Although the cushioning on these shoes feels more balanced than that of the Nimbus 6, they begin breaking down on the lateral side way too quickly (48 miles for me). If you truly are an underpronater, these may not have enough lateral support to be worth the money. I'm also finding that the upper is stretching out, which may be okay at the toe box, but not at the midfoot.

173.	Jim rated this product 5 stars Thu, August 11,2005: I always started off being a big Brooks fan, specifically the ILLUSION, which is now discontinued, so I switched to Asics, looking for a cushioned trainer for high mileage. The GEL Nimbus VI was awesome! It lasted so much longer than I expected, I bought 3 pair...until just recently when they stopped carrying them. I was worried about all the bad reviews for the GEL Nimbus VII, but I went ahead and shelled out the 120 bucks. Great investment. I love the fit, and they're very comfortable. 167 Miles and no blisters or problems. I'm getting another pair!

174.	Johnny rated this product 4 stars Wed, August 10,2005: These are the best running shoe I've owned so far. However, since others have rated this lower, I may look into other options once these are worn. My high rating could be due to using sub quality Nike and New Balance previously. For now, I'm happy.

175.	Julie Seaton-Crow rated this product 5 stars Tue, August 09,2005: I LOVE these shoes!! These are absolutely the BEST cushioned shoes I have ever worn in my 35 year track and field career. I was Illinois State High School 400 meter champion in 76, 77, Big 8 Champion in the 400 and 600 in College for Univ. of Nebraska and ran sprints, 100 through the 800. Now, being 45, I can say I have gone through hundreds of pairs of running shoes over the years and none compare to the cushioning of these shoes. I run alot of 5K's now, and a 10K here and there. I had Plantar Fasciitis problems in the past couple of years and run a little more on asphalt than I used to, otherwise speed work on the track, and Cushioning is key for me. I have had no problems whatsoever with blisters or anything else. These shoes feel like I'm on air and makes me a more efficient runner. I would recommend these shoes to anyone needing cushioning, and they are awesome for me. My husband loves them too, he needs cushioning for his knees and these are the best ones he's run in

176.	Jon rated this product 3 stars Wed, August 03,2005: Prefer the Cumulus VII. Much more forefoot cushioning.

177.	Saul rated this product 1 star Tue, August 02,2005: Have run in ASICS for years, as a New Yorker I'm hard to satisfy admittedly. These shoes are the worst ASICS quality I've ever seen. And the $120 price, ridiculous.

178.	Val rated this product 1 star Tue, August 02,2005: These shoes are terrible; blisters and not a lot of cushioning. For $120 I got ripped off big time.

179.	Melissa rated this product 5 stars Mon, August 01,2005: Took me forever to find the right shoe for me...I'm actually pretty flat footed and pronate when I walk, but just barely when I run. Finally, after too many stability shoes that caused ITB syndrome, somebody put me in the Nimbus VI's. They were fantastic. Went through two of them, then thought I 'd try to find a little lighter shoe. Nothing worked! Came back to the Nimbus and all is well. Very cushioned, perfect fit....the trick is sizing down one half size from your normal size. I wore a 9 1/2 in the VI's, but I wear a 9 in the VII's. SUPER SOFT ride, with great toe off! Makes the long runs for me very bearable.

180.	Christy rated this product 4 stars Wed, July 27,2005: I love them! I'm a walker and hadn't walked much since having a baby. I bought a bad cheap pair of shoes with a high arch and couldn't walk for weeks. I didn't know anything about feet and shoes then. Doctor sent me for arch support, etc.... Made my feet burn and hurt more. Finally I realized I just needed a very cushioned shoe and insert cause I've got some extra weight and I'm tall. Was on vacation and trilled to go to the new Orange co. store. I actually tried some ascis the sales clerk thought I needed due to a low arch, but again, almost instant burning and heel pain. So, I went to the opposite extreme for high arch/heavy runner and just love these shoes with the extra padded insert (I forgot the name, but it's a RR product). I was desperate for pain relieve, so I didn't care about the price and bought the membership so I could return them. I was so amazed my feet are happy now. Haven't had time to actually go walking in them, but I wear them to the park, shopping, hom

181.	dave rated this product 5 stars Tue, July 26,2005: I'm 6'0",180# male,training for my first marathon ,end of september.running upwards of 30 miles a week at this time..I got great service at Scheel's sports.I picked these shoes over the new balance 1023's and the saucony trigon 3 ride..way cushy and comfy,lite weight and responsive when the foot strikes.I wear Ironman Ultramax sox and feel this is a no problem combo for me.foot stays put and no blisters at all..I know there are as many shoes out there as there are runner's and feel this is a worthwhile shoe to try...

182.	Rodney rated this product 1 star Tue, July 26,2005: Run 40+/week-used to wear Nike-tried VIIs,unhappy,blisters and hip pain.

183.	Freddie rated this product 5 stars Mon, July 25,2005: I really love these shoes. I haven't felt this relaxed on runs ever. The cushioning on the Nimbus VII's is simply incredible. I really feel like I'm floating when I go out on runs. Another thing I noticed is that these shoes seem to add a little spring to each step. My previous shoes were the Asica GT-2100 and I'm loving the Nimbus VII's so much more. No problems with blisters or fit problems. Fits like a glove. I'm 5'6, 135 lbs and run 30 miles/week.

184.	Jamie rated this product 1 star Mon, July 25,2005: These shoes are horrible. Too much room in the toes and way too much room in the heels. My heels slip from side to side which has caused blisters and I also have blisters on my toes!!! The cushioning is not great. I gave it one star because I love the bright green color. Back to Nike for me. These were a waste of money.

185.	Ray rated this product 1 star Mon, July 25,2005: Tried a pair after years in Mizuno. Very unhappy, knee problems, heel blisters. Definitely not the shoes for me. Didn't like paying $108 for them either.

186.	Colin rated this product 1 star Sun, July 24,2005: Run 50+ weekly, literally wore out these shoes within 300 miles. Too expensive for the quick wearout.

187.	Ed rated this product 5 stars Sun, July 24,2005: Wow. What a treat is has been running in the numbus VII. They're perfectly named, it's like running on clouds. I wear custom orthotics and so blisters have not been a problem at all. A roomier toebox than even the several pairs of Saucony sitting in the closet. Will be picking up serveral more pairs of these while they are available

188.	George rated this product 1 star Sat, July 23,2005: Been running since high school-40 years. Used thousands of shoes; tried these; got heel blisters. Last heel blister was 35 years ago, in a pair of $5 shoes. Paid $120 for these-somehow inflation kicks in but not at this rate-sure wish my investments returned the same increase. These shoes at $25 would be a good deal.

189.	Gerry rated this product 1 star Fri, July 22,2005: Maybe I'm a little off base but $120 for running shoes is way too expensive. I tried these despite the ridiculously high price. They're just barely ok. I've paid $49 for shoes and gotten just as much comfort. Then I saw they were made in China and thought "Wow $120 for shoes made for about $10". Something's wrong with this picture. I've been screwed before but at least been kissed.

190.	JayG rated this product 4 stars Fri, July 22,2005: I didn't have blister problems with this one. I'm a heavy runner (5-11, 205) and these have been great for me. I bought these after wearing out a pair of 2080s. It was a good upgrade for me. I'm totally sold on Asics now. This is the only brand that has been consistently comfortable for me.I dock one star because these shoes are a tad too expensive. Correct pricing, in my mind, should be $99.

191.	Jim rated this product 1 star Fri, July 22,2005: Tried them, didn't like them due to hot spots on heels and lack of cushioning for $120 bucks.

192.	Larry rated this product 1 star Thu, July 21,2005: Amazing, isn't it? People either 5 star or 1 star these shoes. I 1 starred them due to, yes, blisters which I've never ever had before in any running shoe and overall lack of excitement in a shoe listing at the high end of the price range-$120.

193.	Bob Letourneau rated this product 5 stars Thu, July 21,2005: Bounced around in a couple of different shoes over the past few years and landed in the VI's last year - very happy with them. Willing to try the VII's this year but only after I had them fit checked which resulted in a 1/2 size smaller (10 to 9 1/2). After a couple of mid range tempo's and a 13 long, the VII's are dead nuts on for me. No problems - I like the extra softness this year (mild supinator - mid arch, 46, 180#). Very happy I went with them but certainly more happy that I checked out the fit first for the right size (I also bought a pair speedstar's and those also had to size down 1/2 size - wonder if Asics changed their last sizings??)

194.	AlfredEJohnson rated this product 1 star Thu, July 21,2005: Very disappointed, heel blisters and not as good a shoe as other Nimbus'.

195.	Mauricio Gonzalez rated this product 5 stars Tue, July 19,2005: Compri hace dos semanas los Nymbus VII, en mi pams (Colombia-Sur America) no es facil conseguir zapatillas especializadas para correr, es mas la marca ASICS es practicamente desconocida. Me estoy preparando para una media maratsn luego de una lesisn de tendinitis. Estaba preocupado por la rodilla pero debo decir que las zapatillas NYMBUS son maravillosas pues no he sentido dolor alguno debido al sistema cushoning. No he tenido problemas de ampollas y se ajustan perfectamente a mis pies. Es un producto que seguiri comprando para mis entrenamientos y carerras.

196.	Garrett Mc Donald rated this product 1 star Mon, July 18,2005: Had read some of the early reviews but took a chance. Left shoe at heel just failed. Hard plastic has worn through poor cushioning and is causing blistering on upper heel - this is at less than 100 miles. Really disappointed - as others have put it $120 for blisters!!! Up until now have been an ASICs fanatic.

197.	Bart rated this product 1 star Mon, July 18,2005: Been on vacation a few weeks, run more than when I'm working. Bought VIIs just before vacation to make my own judgment. They are a "ok" shoe, nothing spectacular at all, especially for the $120 price tag. No blisters yet but a lot of hot spots. Cushioning is again nothing great. I've worn ASICs for years and just think these are not one of their better productions of running shoes.

198.	JHMc rated this product 5 stars Mon, July 18,2005: Perhaps it's because I'm not a high mileage runner (longest runs are 7 - 10 miles; typically run 15 - 30 miles per week), but I LOVE this version of the Nimbus. Best fit, feel, and comfort for me in a running shoe in many yeers.

199.	Jeff rated this product 5 stars Sat, July 16,2005: I liked my Nimbus 6's, but I love my Nimbus 7's. I have had no problems with them at all. Another superior Asics product.

200.	Wayne rated this product 1 star Sat, July 16,2005: Put me in the Nimbus blister club with all the other posts. These shoes don't do it for me.

201.	ken rated this product 5 stars Sat, July 16,2005: I have tried all the brands and differant styles and these are the best for me. cushioning is great and it holds my foot in place. u just have to keep searching until u find what works for u.

202.	kim rated this product 5 stars Fri, July 15,2005: I love the cushioning on these shoes! The midsole configuration is so much better than any other Nimbus models. Very smooth transition.

203.	Chris rated this product 5 stars Thu, July 14,2005: I have owned these shoes for a few weeks now and have run about 60 miles so far, and have had no problems whatsoever with them. A common thread through some of the positive reviews seems to be that larger runners like me (6'3" / 220 lbs) seem to find the shoes more comfortable than others. I run with the Nimbus VII shoes and Thorlo socks and find the combined cushioning effect to be fantastic. I have had problems in the past with knee pain during longer runs, but have experience no such issues with these shoes. I highly recommend them.

204.	DickT. rated this product 1 star Thu, July 14,2005: OK shoes; no blisters yet but definitely not one of the better Nimbus editions. I really have a problem with the $120 price tag. What's it cost to make these shoes in China?-probably $15.

205.	Garth rated this product 1 star Wed, July 13,2005: Crappy shoes-blisters and very expensive.

206.	Byron rated this product 1 star Mon, July 11,2005: Ran 10k yesterday with VIIs. Blistered, been running 45 years and never, ever had a blister before. Feel like I've been ripped off by ASICS; $120 shoes producing blisters. Priceless!!!

207.	Eddie rated this product 1 star Mon, July 11,2005: Got a pair 3 weeks ago-blistered on second run-changed socks-still blistered-heel keeps slipping on uphill grades-definitely not one of ASICS better products.

208.	Lou rated this product 1 star Sun, July 10,2005: Save yourself some blisters; I ignored the other posts and got a pair. The first week was pure running, no problems, then in a 15 miler, I blistered at 12 mile mark; kept going and now need to take a week off to have these damn blisters heal. ASICS whatever you did is a travesty.

209.	Brendan rated this product 1 star Sun, July 10,2005: First long Sunday run in these shoes. Bad heel blisters at 12 mile mark.

210.	Larry rated this product 1 star Sat, July 09,2005: RRS, thanks for your comments site, thought I was the only wacko with heel blisters. These shoes don't do the quality job ASICS is usually known for.

211.	Barry rated this product 1 star Sat, July 09,2005: Ditto for heel blisters.

212.	Rick rated this product 1 star Sat, July 09,2005: Heel blisters; for $120??????

213.	Dan Holm rated this product 5 stars Sat, July 09,2005: I have run in every Gel Nimbus model since its inception, and this is the best yet. The cushioning is excellent in both the rearfoot and the forefoot. The forefoot fit is significantly improved over previous models. As recommended, I sized down 1/2 size, and the fit is perfect. As a heavy runner (6'1" 190 lbs.) I cant imagine running in a better shoe. I run 30 miles per week, and have experienced no blisters on my heals or elsewhere. I used to rotate running in the Nimbus with running in the Kayano. I just ordered a second pair of Nimbus VII and plan to shelve the Kayanos.

214.	Erin rated this product 5 stars Sat, July 09,2005: 70 miles and still strong. No blisters.

215.	Steve rated this product 1 star Sat, July 09,2005: Heel blisters at 10 miles.

216.	Seoul Runner rated this product 5 stars Fri, July 08,2005: I have had all models except the Nimbus IV....LOVE THEM!!!!!!! For those who developed blisters, I believe that it is your feet....as I have never had any blisters with these shoes or any others. Ran in the Mizunos, Nike, and so many other brands. Therefore, I caution those reading reviews to not think that these cause blisters!

217.	Jon rated this product 1 star Fri, July 08,2005: Just got a pair three days ago and I already have blisters on my heel. Should have listened to the reviews. Does anyone have any suggestions on great cushioned shoes out there right now?

218.	Tyler rated this product 1 star Tue, July 05,2005: Looks like a love it or leave it relationship with VIIs. I'll leave them after blistering the hell out of my feet in a 15k run on July 4. Thought I'd watch the fireworks display but wound up soaking the blisters in a tub. Ouch!!!!

219.	Kevin rated this product 5 stars Tue, July 05,2005: I can't say enough good things about this shoe. This is the first pair that I've spent >$100 on, and I was skeptical if they were worth it. I liked Nimbus V, never got VI, and wondered why Ascis would try to improve. But these shoes work really well for me. I'm 6'1", 195 lbs, and the cushioning is fabulous. I've had the shoes for about 1 month, and have used them for track interval workouts and 10-11 mile runs. Never had a problem with blistering. I love the looser toe-box and the better forefoot cushioning. Gives the shoe a much more "natural" feel, almost like I'm running barefoot - but with the cushioning. It felt strange when I first ran in them, and almost like they were unstable. But I think that is just because I was used to shoes that were tighter and more binding. I really like the looser toebox fit now. I would never want to have to go back to the Nimbus V's.

220.	Brett rated this product 1 star Mon, July 04,2005: Ran 10k today with new VIIs. First 8k was great, thought these shoes were unbelievable. Then and why I don't know, I blistered in the final 2k. Sending them back.

221.	Heather rated this product 5 stars Sun, July 03,2005: I have fairly narrow heels, but haven't even had a hot spot from these shoes. I did go down half a size from what I wore with the Nimbus VI and Landreth. The VII cushioning is so much better, more responsive than the VI. Very glad to see the "dynamic cradle" thing is gone.

222.	Art rated this product 1 star Sat, July 02,2005: Initially great shoes for 50 miles. Then heel blisters. Changed socks, wore 2 pairs at same time, nothing worked. Returned shoes for refund. Won't pay $120 for shoes that blister my feet.

223.	Josh rated this product 1 star Thu, June 30,2005: Blisters, blisters, blisters, after 5 mile run-unusual for me; back to Mizuno.

224.	Tom rated this product 1 star Wed, June 29,2005: See where Nimbus VII debate continues. Maybe I'm stupid, but why such an intense debate on shoes costing $120. I tried them, got foot blisters and returned them for a refund. No debate needed. The comments about breaking them in , sizing down, and proper socks could apply to shoes for $29, but $120 shoes, no way.

225.	Butch K. rated this product 1 star Tue, June 28,2005: Us runners are an independent breed. As a long time Nimbus'er; expected a lot from the VII version. Doesn't do the job for me-Yes, blisters-never had any in prior Nimbus. VIIs are different, why mess with success???? If the VIIs float your boat, great but they sunk my boat.

226.	Wayne rated this product 5 stars Mon, June 27,2005: I love these shoes. No blisters, great cushioning, very comfortable. Like others have said, everyone's feet are a little different, but I'm ready to stock up on these shoes!

227.	Jake rated this product 1 star Mon, June 27,2005: I ordered VIIs despite the blister warnings from other runners. First few runs were fun, thought the shoes were great. Then I blistered badly in a 10k race. Shoes returned to RRS-ASICs you have a problem-1 or 2 runners with blisters is not a problem, but it sure sounds like many runners blister in the VIIs.

228.	Shelley rated this product 1 star Sun, June 26,2005: I'm a marathoner, ordered the Nimbus VIIs, ran a 15k, stopped after 5k, blisters. What in the hell did Asics do to these shoes? I'm not a happy person right now. I've never, ever blistered before and don't let me hear any crap about sizing down or watching the socks. These shoes eat it!!!

229.	Saul rated this product 1 star Sun, June 26,2005: Not happy-$120 for 2 heel blisters after a 5 mile run

230.	Eric rated this product 5 stars Sun, June 26,2005: Forgot to rate

231.	Paul rated this product 1 star Sun, June 26,2005: Tried VIIs-big mistake for me-blistered badly during today's early run-had sized down as recommended by other raters. Really unhappy with ASICS-for $120 I expected a lot more quality.

232.	Stephen Lawhon rated this product 5 stars Sat, June 25,2005: I LOVE THESE SHOES. The Nimbus VI are the ones that gave me blisters on my heels. I sized down a 1/2 size with the VII as recommended and...perfect. Let's face it--everyone's foot is different. What works for some will not work for others. To say that Asics needs to re-work these shoes and that loyalty is lost is absurd. Next year's model will probably not fit me but will everyone else. Bottom line: try them on and see if they work--if not, then try one of the other umpteen models available.

233.	Sol rated this product 1 star Thu, June 23,2005: I am on break at work, so I thought it's time to review Nimbus VIIs comments. I have run about 75 miles in a pair of VIIs. Well, guess what? I too blistered in both heels. I can't believe ASICs would generate such a poorly tested product. When you pay $108 for shoes, you expect perfection and should demand perfection.

234.	Joshua rated this product 1 star Thu, June 23,2005: Thought I was the only nut with a blister. Thanks for your support, fellow RRS members.

235.	Sam rated this product 1 star Thu, June 23,2005: I'm on the heel blister train too. ASICs; fix the problem asap.

236.	Tony rated this product 1 star Thu, June 23,2005: I'm now a charter member of the heel blister club thanks to the VIIs-never had a heel blister in 45 running years until now-ASICS your VIIs are junk.

237.	randy rated this product 1 star Wed, June 22,2005: Truthfully, I'm not hopping on the bandwagon but I'm not loving the VII's...in fact I too have developed blisters in my heel. I typically LOVE Asics and the way the VI sucked up to my foot when I laced it up gave me goosebumps, but the VII doesn't have that same fit. It feels sloppy to me :(

238.	Jason rated this product 1 star Wed, June 22,2005: VIs were great, VIIs blistered the you know what out of my feet.

239.	paul rated this product 5 stars Tue, June 21,2005: forgot to rate them... please see my review..under "paul"

240.	Billy rated this product 1 star Fri, June 17,2005: Blistered both heels on third run-ouch!!!

241.	Sara rated this product 4 stars Fri, June 17,2005: Loved the Nimbus VI. VII is still a good shoe but there are differences. VIIs seem to have more rearfoot cushioning and are slightly more responsive, which I like. Also seem slightly more stable. On the downside, they are longer and wider, which will make anyone who had found the PERFECT fit in the Nimbus VI unhappy. I tried sizing down a 1/2 size and found those too small; my old size is just slightly too big. Overall, still a good shoe and works well for a small runner with high arches who needs extra cushioning.

242.	Ray rated this product 5 stars Thu, June 16,2005: Forgot to rate!

243.	Erin rated this product 5 stars Thu, June 16,2005: I remember that when the Nimbus VI first came out there were LOTS of complaints and low ratings on this forum, because it was such a change from the Nimbus V. People got over it, I guess, and then you saw mostly positive comments and high ratings. I haven't had any problems, so far, and have only experienced good, protective cushioning and a (finally) well-ventilated upper. I think I'd like to see how these hold up over the next several weeks, particularly in knees, shins, arches, Achilles, etc., and post again.

244.	Alfred rated this product 1 star Thu, June 16,2005: I run 40-50 per week. Have used Nimbus" for many years and editions of the shoe. VIs were great. Tried VIIs, ran a 10k and stopped after the 5k mark with heel blisters on both feet. What a disappointment the VIIs are. ASICS you now have the challenge to either change the VII flaws or get the VIIIs into production now OR face the consequence of losing a lot of customers to Nike, Mizuno, etc.

245.	Rachel rated this product 3 stars Thu, June 16,2005: I have loved my Nimbus VIs, so I was happy to buy the Nimbus VIIs when they came out. However, the changes in the VIIs are not positive, at least for my feet. The VIIs seem longer and wider than the VIs, especially in the toe box. ASs a result, my toes shift around a bit when I run, and rub against the stitching inside the instep - blisters at any distance over three miles. Just ordered another pair of VIs, which are perfect. Wish Asics hadn't tampered with what worked.

246.	YIMMA rated this product 2 stars Wed, June 15,2005: FORGOT TO RATE

247.	Prescott rated this product 1 star Tue, June 14,2005: Asics Nimbus has been my shoe of choice for many years through several models. Unfortunately, the VIIs don't fit me properly; heels are too tight creating blistering and other discomfort.

248.	Dan rated this product 5 stars Mon, June 13,2005: I just disagree with the winers. This is a fine shoe with great cushioning. The fit is so much better than the VI's. I was having some pain in the forefoot with my previous shoe--Hurricane 7's--and this shoe took care of it.

249.	Paul rated this product 5 stars Mon, June 13,2005: Great shoe with great fit. Cushioning is awesome. Asics made the heel fit like a glove. I usually have heel slippage with other Asics models. Asics finally got it right as far as fit is concerned. Hope you don't change a thing--if you do, I'm back to Brooks or Saucony.

250.	Dean rated this product 1 star Mon, June 13,2005: Had same problems with blisters in heels as others stated. Not one of Asics' better products.

251.	Bob Cilano rated this product 2 stars Sun, June 12,2005: I'm a heavy runner (over 220 lb) who puts in 3-4 miles a day. Coming from a pair of Wave Creation '04's, these left me a little disappointed. The fit is fine, but the right shoe's cushion in the ball of the foot is too stiff. I've never had that problem with a pair of shoes before. I'm a long time Asics fan and these just dented my loyalty.

252.	ellie rated this product 5 stars Sun, June 12,2005: I like what Asics has done with the cushioning-making the shoes more "centered" so that my feet don't feel thrown off to the lateral sides. I also like the increase in flexibility w/o loss of stability because I thought that previous versions were very still. The changes to the upper, for the most part, are good, with more durable biomorphic panels and more toe space. Although I haven't had a problem with the heels, the heel fit is definately less cushioned than the 6, and slips a little. No blisters, and not enough of a big deal to make me switch to another brand, but I plan to try the Landreth.

253.	johnnywalker rated this product 1 star Sat, June 11,2005: They were just ok, lots of issues though. Heel left me a bit sore...when you flex them they break in the middle which in my experience leads to plantar fasciitis...looks like they have 2 midsoles, like the fashion shoes that have the midsole inside...I think thats what makes it so stiff....Can someone just make a smooth neutral cushioned shoe.

254.	Wes rated this product 1 star Sat, June 11,2005: The VIIs had me stop during a 10k with blisters and achillies issues.

255.	Trent rated this product 1 star Fri, June 10,2005: Worn AsICS for years; sorry all you 5 star raters; these just aren't for me-blisters, knee pain-what did ASICS tinker with versus the VIs? Back I go to Mizuno until the VIIIs come out.

256.	Saul rated this product 5 stars Thu, June 09,2005: Great fitting shoe for me. I usually have problems with heel slippage, but these shoes fit great--as good a fit as my Brooks Adrenaline with a much better cushioned ride. Also, I had metatarsal pain due in part to poor forefoot cushioning on the Adrenalines and these have all but taken care of the problem. I think I have found my new shoes. I'm 6'2, 210 lbs and run 15-20 miles per week.

257.	Beth rated this product 5 stars Sat, June 04,2005: These have worked out well for me so far. I agree that the fit is slightly looser overall than the 6s, but I didn't size down; instead got socks that were just a little thicker and haven't had any problems (after 80 miles). These shoes have an incredibly smooth ride. I also picked up the Landreth to rotate. I'd never worn Asics before the Nimbus 6.

258.	Patrick rated this product 4 stars Fri, June 03,2005: This is a follow up to my review below, the Nimbus VII is working out fine, sizing down a half size, still some issues with the heel, Asics is using a different insole material in the VII which is different ( spongier) than the previous models contributing to friction in the heel. I trimed the upper ( hard edge ) of the insert at the heel and this seems to help. Asics should go back to the older insert.

259.	Josh rated this product 1 star Wed, May 18,2005: ASICS, shame, shame with the VII. You improved the shoe but tinkered too much with the heel. I sit here with 2 huge blisters and mounting angst at you. Please fix the gosh darn problem and dont try to reinvent the wheel.

260.	erick potel rated this product 5 stars Wed, May 18,2005: great all around, especially at distance

261.	Patrick rated this product 4 stars Wed, May 18,2005: The nimbus 7 provides greater cushioning than the 5 which I ran in, I skipped the 6. One thing I noticed is I had to down size a half size to a 9 due to a loose fit. I ran in the 9 1/2 a I too got a blister on my right (smaller ) heel ( great run otherwise) . After pulling the insert out I noticed that there is a rubber cushioned section to the last. Along with the insert material used this allows the heel to drop on impact ( particularly with heel strikers) thus causing some friction. I will report back after I have tried the smaller size-cautiously optimistic

262.	Jack rated this product 1 star Wed, May 18,2005: Sounds like love/hate revirews with no in between opinions. I'm sending thes back. Didn't blister but can see where people would because heels are much tighter vs. sixes. Cushioning is much less than former nimbus editions.

263.	Joe rated this product 1 star Wed, May 18,2005: Diappointed with VIIs. Feel like Brooks Epiphany model; little cushioning and yes I blistered too because the heel cup is much tighter.

264.	FRED rated this product 5 stars Wed, May 18,2005: Best nimbus yet great cushion forefoot and heel very responsive one problem i had with the 6 is forefoot midsole didnt have balanced thickness medial versus lateral which caused you to run on the outside off your feet not good if your neutral but ASICS SEAMS TO HAVE SOLVED THAT PROBLEM so far iam happy no blisters

265.	Erin rated this product 5 stars Tue, May 17,2005: Maybe the back-of-the-heel blistering is due to having less cushioning there, than the VI had. The heel does fit looser, but thicker socks took care of that for me. I agree that these shoes give a very smooth ride and good support/cushioning.

266.	Bobby rated this product 1 star Tue, May 17,2005: Have worn Nimbus' for several years. Nimbus VI was extremely good; however you can take or leave the dynamic foot cradle for whatever that means.The Nimbus VII gat an "F" grade from me. I thought I was nuts after blistering in the left heel area until I read the other messages. ASICS, please don't keep trying to fix something that isn't broken.

267.	Cory rated this product 1 star Mon, May 16,2005: Just finished first run in VIIs. Like other posts, blistered left heel; right shoe ok. Something is wrong, ASICS please take feedback and do research. Correct issues because other than blistering, these shoes are good.

268.	elizabeth rated this product 5 stars Sun, May 15,2005: It sounds like a love-hate relationship with these. I love them, for lots of reasons. I tried the 5 and hated them, wore the 6 and really liked them, but thought they were still a little chunky. These have a very smooth ride, with excellent heel-to-toe transition. An unexpected bonus is that I've even been able to run a little faster, maybe because that huge hunk of foam (dynamic cradle) has been replaced by a more efficient system. I don't notice any loss of midfoot support with the redesigned midfoot support system. The upper is more open, and the mesh more ventilated. I didn't size down from the size I wore in the 6, but it is a slightly looser fit, and I just pulled the laces a little tighter. I'm very happy with the cushioning, and have not even experienced a hot spot, much less a blister, so can't identify with those who did. I've always worn Wave Creations, and last year rotated with the Nimbus 6, but I will stay with the 7s exclusively.

269.	Bob rated this product 1 star Sun, May 15,2005: Tried VIIs after having great successes with several pairs of VIs. Prefer the VIs; like other posts, I blistered in VIIs. Been running for 35 years and rarely blistered before. ASICS needs to see if there is a defect in early production of VIIs. To those posts saying VIIs are great, happy trails and running.

270.	michael rated this product 5 stars Sat, May 14,2005: well guys if your blistering on your first run you probably didn't break in your shoes well enough or you are probably a runner who is in the wrong shoe-- this shoe is awesome excellent cushoning from the last model-- sorry guys i'm with erin on this one-- i'm stocking up----

271.	Bud rated this product 1 star Sat, May 14,2005: Strange goings on here with the Nimbus VII. I too blistered on left heel with first run in the shoes. They're on their way back to RRS.

272.	Hank rated this product 1 star Fri, May 13,2005: I give these shoes just 1 star. I loved the Blue Nimbus VI. The VII is bigger in size, suggest sizing down 1/2 size vs. the VI. Also, the soles are much redesigned vs. the VI; i.e. not as thick and not as cushioned. Finally, on my first run in the VII I blistered in heel of left foot. Never did blister in any previous Nimbus models. Sure wish ASICS would stop tinkering with the Nimbus, leave it alone.

273.	erin rated this product 5 stars Wed, May 11,2005: awesome shoe i love what asics did with this new model- great cushioning in the forefoot and heel. very breathable for those hot summer days-- it's worth the extra 10 dollars that asics priced up-looking forward to my next pair.

Women's ASICS GEL-Nimbus VII

Find Out First

Stay Connected

We Care

Site Info

Referral Program

Gift Cards

Road Runner Sports
VIP Club Membership

Company Info

Customer Service

Women's ASICS GEL-Nimbus VII

Find Out First

Stay Connected

We Care

Site Info

Referral Program

Gift Cards

Road Runner SportsVIP Club Membership

Company Info

Customer Service

Road Runner Sports
VIP Club Membership