|
|
|
1.
|
sharon rated this product
4 stars
Fri, August 14,2009:
Really like this shoe, it feels good on long runs. Only draw back is that it feels a little heavy.Do feel that my feet are supported and like the space at the front allowing plenty of toe room
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Terri rated this product
4 stars
Mon, June 08,2009:
I, too, was very loyal to the creed turned empire shoe...the 3000 is okay...but I have also noticed it seems to breaks down faster with long runs. I may try another brand that has comparable shoe the Empire.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Laura rated this product
4 stars
Tue, May 12,2009:
Shoe feels great but the mesh top only lasted a couple of months...my big toe put holes in it!!!! Other than that feels great
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Katy Bradford rated this product
3 stars
Wed, March 25,2009:
This shoe starts out great, but cushioning faded quickly as I have run in mine for only 10 weeks. The toebox is also quite roomy.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Dawn rated this product
4 stars
Fri, March 20,2009:
I am running in the 3000 as a replacement for the Empires. I don't love them as well, but it's the closest I can find.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Charlotte rated this product
4 stars
Thu, February 19,2009:
Great shoe with great arch support. But the material with the mesh on top of the shoe is not sturdy. My toes wore holes and were popping out within 3 months. The material should last longer than 3 months. All my other running shoes have lasted the recommended mileage length. The comfort and the rest of the shoe are excellent.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Wed, July 30,2008:
I agree it is the closest to the 2120, did not like the 2130 either. I like the wide toe box and have found this to be a great shoe!!
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Lisa rated this product
5 stars
Wed, July 30,2008:
So far, so good. I wore the 2120 for a couple of years and the 3000 is the closest thing I can find to the 2120. I tried the 2130 first because I saw it advertised as a replacement for the 2120. That style didn't work for me. The 3000 should be advertised as a replacement for the 2120. The 3000 is a great shoe!
|
|
|
|
9.
|
tm rated this product
3 stars
Thu, June 19,2008:
the forefoot is too wide and I felt my feet were swimming inside. the sole was pretty rigid, too. I liked it initially, but had to give up after 30-40miles.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
roxy rated this product
2 stars
Thu, June 05,2008:
Good toe room. Lost comfort after 2 miles. Not enough padding in ball of foot. The fit reminds me of Kayano but doesn't run like a Kayano.Don't feel sturdy. I usually run in Nimbus but tried different model.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Linda rated this product
4 stars
Sat, May 31,2008:
I like the shoe for shorter runs, they seem to lose soome comfort on the longer ones. I wish they'd bring back the original EMPIRES.
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Carla rated this product
5 stars
Wed, May 21,2008:
This shoe is excellent for pronation on the inner front of the foot.Great cushioning.I did 20 miles and don't get any blisters in these area that are used to have after a long run.MARVELOUS THANKS
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Evelyn rated this product
5 stars
Tue, March 18,2008:
Excellent shoe feel great wide toe box and good cushioning.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
mar rated this product
4 stars
Sun, March 16,2008:
I like the shoe except for the toe box, it seems wide.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Wendy rated this product
5 stars
Fri, February 15,2008:
Great shoe. However, I believe they run a little shorter.
|
