|
|
|
|
1.
|
Zane rated this product
4 stars
Mon, December 14,2009:
I'm happy with this shoe...way happier than I was with the 2140 and 2150. I've been running ASICs since the Gel Lyte and was ready to switch brands after my 2150 experience. Glad I tried these. Confidence in ASICS somewhat restored.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Tue, December 08,2009:
I've found them to be perfectly adapt to my running gait. But I think that everyone has an individual running gait. As for me, I'm a near "motion control' runner. But I really don't want to bother. I went with this shoe because it does have that stability reinforcement on the inside of the shoe, in addition, its very low to the ground and has a low-cut feel. Which means I can really allow my ankles to move and relax. As for cush? I find it to be better than the 3000 and also a lot more flexible.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Jason rated this product
2 stars
Sun, November 22,2009:
I bought these shoes because they have more cushioning (gel) in the heel, but it was a mistake. The shoe is poorly designed - the gel in the heel is not distributed evenly; the majority of it is on the outside. As a result, it caused my feet to suppinate extemely - I've had right knee pain for a month now. The heels on shoes also wore very fast; these are too expensive to replace so soon.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
T. M. rated this product
5 stars
Mon, November 16,2009:
Perhaps the only shoe reliably directed at the late stage overpronator. The arch is more subtle than last year's model(a good thing--if you have a high arch you probably do not need this type of shoe!) and the medial support extends further towards toe-off. The 3010 is smooth, well made, and after ~100 miles, shows little sign of wear. Excellent.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
LLL rated this product
1 star
Sun, November 15,2009:
I'm 5'8 190 lbs. Not my normal weight, been running in the 2140's but due to recent weight gain I thought more cushioning would help untill I'm back to my normal 175 lbs. Have been doing between 4 and 5 miles for a usual run. Ran in the 3010's today and after 3.5 had to stop and walk home. They gave me a blister on my right heel and I had extreme pain in my left achilles tendon. Too narrow thru the midfoot. Definately not the shoe for me.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
T. Carter rated this product
3 stars
Sat, November 14,2009:
I've worn the Creed, Creed Plus, Empire, Empire 2 shoes over the years. The Creed were the best ever. The Plus was just awfully stiff, the Empire's were more like the Creed and I had 3 pair of those. These 3010 are worse than any shoe I've ever had. I work the Kayano 15 and they were okay before getting the 3010. The Kayanos didn't have enough cushion in the forefoot so I figured the 3010s had to be better. They are awful. My feet have never felt so awful. The outer edge of my feet felt as if there was a stick poking them. I've ordered the new Kayano 16. I hope they are better.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Pat rated this product
3 stars
Thu, November 12,2009:
Very comfortable, although I have sustained two different injuries since switching to these (from the 2140s). I have not been injured in 8 years, having run numerous marathons in that time. Any ideas as to what might be different between these and the 2140s & now 2150s? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Brad rated this product
5 stars
Fri, October 02,2009:
Excellent shoe. I have worn the 2000 series shoes for several years, but the 3000 series is definitely a step up. Very comfortable with great cushioning.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Tue, September 08,2009:
I was a huge fan of the GEL Empire II until it was discontinued. The GEL 3000 didn't come close to the Empire II, however, for those Empire II fans, the 3010 is a step up. The heel is not nearly as tight as the 3000, the IGS system is dialed in and the toe box is perfect. I tried numerous other shoes, but nothing compares to the cushioning in the heel and the almost launching to forefoot that the IGS system provides.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
P.M. rated this product
5 stars
Mon, September 07,2009:
This shoe is great. This is my first year doing crosscountry and this shoe has made foot injuries a rare occurance. I'm getting close to 200 miles since I've gotten these shoes and they have yet to show major wear and tear. I expect to get around 500 miles in these. The large toebox is great too.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Ben rated this product
4 stars
Mon, September 07,2009:
If you liked the Gel-Kayano 14 but disliked the 15, this is the shoe for you. The cushioning and ride aren't quite up to Gel-Kayano standards, but the important thing is that the fit of the 3010 is very similar to the fit of the 14. In particular, the 3010 has a large toe box, unlike the 15. (It also has conventional lacing, not that insane system the 15 has. Who thinks these things up, anyway?) I adored my two pair of Gel-Kayano 14's, but they're gone. The 3010's will do until ASICS gets it Gel-Kayano act together.
|
|
|
|
12.
|
moov forward rated this product
4 stars
Sat, May 09,2009:
An improvement from last year. Not as stiff with a very smooth ride. If you like a low profile stability shoe with forefoot control and a lower arch than the kayano or 2140 this is it. The posting doesn't get in the way or lever your heel out and the forefoot control is subtle but nice;snug heel and midfoot and a WIDE forefoot, Flexibility is better than last years 3000.
|
|
