|
|
|
1.
|
Sarah H rated this product
5 stars
Wed, January 27,2010:
I love this shoes, I'm so happy that it is a classic!
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Marie rated this product
1 star
Sun, January 24,2010:
Agree not enough cushioning in the foot box, the wost pair of Asics I have ever owned. I may switch brands after years of loyalty.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Jenn McGuire rated this product
2 stars
Tue, December 29,2009:
Hate is a strong word. I've worn ASICS 2100 series for a couple of years now. Enjoyed the 2140s and now the 2150s. I bought the 2110s because they were on sale but found there wasn't enough cushioning in the toe region. I felt this way from day one and ran about 100 miles in them before giving up and succumbing to buying something else.
I require a bit of extra support as I am 5'9 but these did not provide it!
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Lisa rated this product
1 star
Wed, November 11,2009:
I have been using 2110's for years and did like them. The last two pairs, however, have seemed to wear out within a few months. The tread on the bottom just seems to disappear now which stinks since I did love the feel of them and have no other problems. Granted these aren't the most expensive shoes out there, but they should last more than 3 months for a walker like me.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Sarah rated this product
5 stars
Mon, July 06,2009:
I've been wearing these shoes since they came out. I cannot even count how many pairs I have been through! I run 40-50 miles a week and haven't had any injuries with these shoes. I get more than 400 miles out of each pair as well.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Jaye rated this product
5 stars
Sun, April 12,2009:
I spent an hour reviewing ALL the new GT's to the Kayano and at this price, I could not resist re-purchasing the same shoe that has proven performance for me - especially at this price!!
Thanks RoadRunnner...
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Jani rated this product
5 stars
Fri, April 03,2009:
Thanks, Roadrunner, for having this "oldie but goodie." I am not a runner, but someone with serious foot issues. I wear a custom orthodic in a running shoe (ASIC) 99.99% of the time. The newer GT's (2130) just didn't work for me. LOVE this shoe: both the fit and the look. For me, the cushioning, stability, and heel fit (my heel is narrow) are great.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Thu, March 26,2009:
I love these. Fit and comfort better than 2120 and 2130 so far. I have not tried 2140 yet. I run long distances on roads in them and no issues.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
jross rated this product
2 stars
Sat, February 28,2009:
Not worth the price of sore knees and not enough cushion. Hard to break in. Good for walking around but I'm investing in 2140's.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
thehealthymom.com rated this product
5 stars
Tue, February 10,2009:
I ran the Pikes Peak Ascent, my first marathon and first half marathon in GT-2110s.
I love these shoes - I have been wearing GT-2110s for years, and am very sad they don't make them anymore.
They have great cushion, support and are so comfortable. I've run trail, road and dreadmill on them.
I tried the GT-2120s and they had a completely different fit.
If you loved the GT-2110s and found another shoe that you love equally, I'd love to hear about it.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Thu, January 29,2009:
best of them all
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Alex rated this product
5 stars
Tue, November 11,2008:
These shoes are amazing. Use them at the gym with x-traing and treadmill and use them for running. Good for short distance and long distance. These shoes have good cushioning for med. to high arches and are very comfortable. Great shock absorber and last a very good amount of time; for me about 1 year
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Vanessa rated this product
5 stars
Tue, September 23,2008:
Had this shoe during training for indoor/outdoor collegiate track. I ran anywhere from 4-12 miles 6x week and they got me through both seasons. Good shoe, light weight, great on my shins. definitely get them again
|
|
|
|
14.
|
s in florida rated this product
3 stars
Sun, June 29,2008:
I have worn Asics for years after switching from Mizuno, but no more. The last two pair (including these) have broken down very quickly. I once loved Asics for their spring but found little or none in these shoes.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Kelsea rated this product
5 stars
Wed, May 07,2008:
Some people may not like these shoes, but I have been running in asics for years and I first had the 2100's and loved them, but these are my absolute favorite. Tried the 2120's and had knee and achilles problems, so I had to go around and find some 2110's and I will probably never run in any other shoe again!
|
|
|
|
16.
|
diamondsrunner rated this product
3 stars
Tue, March 25,2008:
I used to SWEAR by Asics. They were always a perfect fit right out of the box. The 2100's were absolutely wonderful shoes. These however are not. They broke down fast, and the toebox is different. There isn't much spring in these at all. I have switched to Sauconys and am SO SO happy with them. Asics seems to be changing there designs and not for the better.I have ran marathons in the 2100's...but would never consider running one in these.
|
|
|
|
17.
|
debjane rated this product
2 stars
Sun, January 28,2007:
I loved these shoes for about 2 months. Then I realized they were wearing out in several places. I run about 25 mi./week. This pair is about the 3rd Asics pair I've bought that I've ultimately been disappointed in. And it may be the last pair of Asics I buy until I read reviews where the company has overhauled its quality control. I developed Achilles tendon problems as well as metatarsal problems with this shoe. Thanks to the other reviewers who revealed the same problems I was having! I just didn't want to believe my problems were occuring because of this shoe!
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Morocha rated this product
3 stars
Tue, January 09,2007:
When I started to use this shoes were great...but...with the time...I developed metatarsal problems at the base of my toes from excessive flexibility of this shoes in the forefoot....
|
|
|
|
19.
|
John rated this product
5 stars
Tue, January 02,2007:
The only shoe I can run in. I have tryed several different brands.
|
|
|
|
20.
|
janna rated this product
2 stars
Tue, November 28,2006:
The 2110's are much wider in the heel and toebox than the 2100, not offering the stable support of 2100. I was very dissapointed as the 2100's I put on out of the box and never took them off.
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Colleen Becker rated this product
1 star
Mon, November 13,2006:
Initially, these shoes seemed above average. They wore out very quickly, however, and became hard on my joints (esp. knees) and aggravated my Achilles tendon. Switched to the Trigon 4 Ride, and am much better served. Over the past couple of years, I have become increasingly unimpressed with Asics, but only recently found a suitable alternative. I am a small build runner (125 lbs.) with low arches and no pronation issues. Probably should have purchased a neutral shoe at the start.
|
|
|
|
22.
|
Temy rated this product
5 stars
Mon, November 06,2006:
My first fitted running shoes. I love the support and light weight feel. My knees hurt less now.
|
|
|
|
23.
|
JoyRoseM rated this product
1 star
Sun, October 22,2006:
I wish I could give these shoes less than 1 star. Asics used to be my favorite shoe. I called them my "car" because I put them on straight out of the box and they took me wherever I wanted to go, from a 5k to a marathon. I'm a tall woman and have always had to run in men's shoes because of my long, narrow feet. I used to run in Kayanos until Spril 2001 when they totally changed the design and were too wide for my feet. I recently settled on the GT-2110 because it came in a men's narrow, but I find that with each new model Asics manages to make a cheaper, less supportive and less cushioned shoe. My pair scarcely lasted 3 months before it lost all ability to slow my pronation and my forefoot and knees ached from the dead cushioning. Additionally, I have run slower in these shoes than any other. A new model is being released by November 1st, so I can only hope it is better. The 2110 will be on sale, but my advice is DON"T BUY THEM. I wouldn't take another pair for free.
|
|
|
|
24.
|
Candace rated this product
5 stars
Tue, October 10,2006:
Great running shoe! I have always ran in Mizunos but tried these after having some pain. Word of caution- I did need to get a narrow shoe in these. Great cushioning and support without being too heavy.
|
|
|
|
25.
|
Kat rated this product
4 stars
Wed, June 28,2006:
I love this shoe, it's the most comfortable one out there
|
|
|
|
26.
|
john brown rated this product
5 stars
Tue, June 27,2006:
I must of got a defective pair the first time. tried another pair and they felt great. more roomy than the 2100 which may bother some runners but i like it
|
|
|
|
27.
|
Erin - see comments below rated this product
2 stars
Mon, June 26,2006:
See comments below. One positive thing to add to my negative comments below...the 2110's have a good amount of cushioning.
|
|
|
|
28.
|
alex rated this product
5 stars
Tue, June 20,2006:
Great all around shoe. I have no arch whatsover and was running in Adidas for years. I tried these on and will never go back. I'm stuck on it!
|
|
|
|
29.
|
john brown rated this product
1 star
Fri, June 16,2006:
the 2100 is a classic. this shoe is not! MUCH wider and missing a lot of the spring the 2100 had.
|
|
|
|
30.
|
Michele rated this product
4 stars
Mon, June 05,2006:
These shoes are very comfortable in the toe area. However, when I took them out for their first run, the inside part of my left arch was aching and stiff. My right foot is slightly bigger than my left; I also have flat feet. So maybe my feet are the culprit. Does anyone have any ideas? If these don't work, what would you recommend for a small build, flat-footed, person...?
|
|
|
|
31.
|
AZ rated this product
5 stars
Wed, May 31,2006:
at first i didn't like these shoes, they made me feel like i was running on a platform 2 inches off the ground (sounds cool, but it isn't). It also felt like there was no heel lift at all, thus making the shoe feel slow. But after about 5 runs of about 5 miles they set very well and now they feel great. i think this is because of the "space trussic system." anyway, now that they are broken in they feel amazing. they definietly aren't like the 2100 although i really liked those too (i am a loyal to the 2000 series), but the two shoes feel very different, there is a little more stability in the 2110s and the ride is a little smoother. i have about 200 miles on my first pair and they show no signs of breaking down anytime soon. 5'11'', 160, medium arch, moderate pronator
|
|
|
|
32.
|
Michelle Dillingham rated this product
1 star
Thu, May 11,2006:
This shoe has done nothing but slow me down. I feel as if I have to make the shoe work. The forefoot is sloppy and I experience lower leg fatigue and foot pain. I should have stocked up on the 2100'.
|
|
|
|
33.
|
Stacey rated this product
2 stars
Tue, April 25,2006:
This is the first Asics stability shoe that has caused me problems. The heel felt loose and the toe box was a little big. After just a few runs I had blisters.
|
|
|
|
34.
|
RJ rated this product
4 stars
Sun, April 16,2006:
I find the 2110s to be comfortable and well cushioned. I ran 5 miles in them today and felt great - really noticed the cushioning. I am 6'2", 185 lbs and wear a size 13. The 2110s do seem a little larger than the 13s I have been used to. If these shoes maintain adequate cushioning for 400+ miles then I would raise the rating to 5.
|
|
|
|
35.
|
Dana rated this product
4 stars
Fri, April 14,2006:
4 stars :)
|
|
|
|
36.
|
Greg H. rated this product
1 star
Fri, April 14,2006:
I've worn the 2080, 2100 and various Nimbus shoes over the years. The 2110 is the first shoe to cause me problems. I developed metatarsal problems at the base of my toes from the excessive flexibility of this shoe in the forefoot. I compared the sole of the 2100 and the 2110. The 2100 has a flex groove that zig zags across the sole, the 2110 has a straight flex groove. The result is the 2110 bends easier at the forefoot causing increased pressure at the base of the toes. I switch to the Nimbus which has a stiffer forefoot and my toe problems slowly went away.
|
|
|
|
37.
|
wrecks rated this product
1 star
Sun, April 02,2006:
This shoe feels good while I'm running in it; good cushioning and response. But it looks like it doesn't control my overpronation. After 73 miles the soles are wearing on the inside front, plus I kick my ankle sometimes when bringing my foot forward, which tells me I'm toeing off on the inside of my foot. These shoes are heavy--and for no good reason, because they don't control anything. I've been rotating them with the 1110 and the new balance 766. And those seem to work fine, with outsole wear in the middle.
|
|
|
|
38.
|
Srunner rated this product
5 stars
Fri, March 31,2006:
Very nice shoes..Cushionning and stability is very nice ..fitting is very good..heel fit is a little loose..heel height is more lower than gt-2100. this shoes feeling is slow than gt-2100 because low heel height. forefoot cushioning is great..and heel chshioning is very cush..stabily is very good.! Entire feeling is similar to gt-2090 but, cushinning is more superior than gt-2100 , gt-2090
|
|
|
|
39.
|
Jeff rated this product
2 stars
Thu, March 30,2006:
This was the first asics I ever wore and the every time I ran with it it gave me bad metatarsal pain every time that I had to stop less than a mile into a run. The heel feels really loose. Only good thing I can say that is good is the cushioning.
|
|
|
|
40.
|
Albert rated this product
4 stars
Sun, March 26,2006:
I've run in ASCICS since the '70s (remember the "Extender"?) and the 1000 and 2000 lines have generally been great. I thought the GT2100 was a perfect shoe. The GT2110 has a really hard heel counter, and is rubs the back of my heel like the GT2100 never did (or any other ASCICS shoe I've worn). I ended up lacing it more loosely, and the problem went away (try it!). The "ride" of the GT2110 is very nice, and I think its mechanics are as good or better than the GT2100. Just wish they'd do something about the heel counter.
|
|
|
|
41.
|
socalrunner rated this product
1 star
Thu, March 23,2006:
I'm blaiming severe tibialis anterior tendonits on these shoes. These won't replace your 2090s or 2100s.
|
|
|
|
42.
|
Brandi Knight rated this product
5 stars
Wed, March 15,2006:
This has been my favorite pair of shoes ever! I used to run in Brooks Adrenaline and switched to Asics and I am much happier!
|
|
|
|
43.
|
Brandi Knight rated this product
1 star
Wed, March 15,2006:
This has been my favorite pair of shoes ever! I used to run in Brooks Adrenaline and switched to Asics and I am much happier!
|
|
|
|
44.
|
fitmomof3 rated this product
5 stars
Fri, March 10,2006:
Went from Asics Gel Landreth to 2110. Much happier in 2110s. Feel more supported and cushioned.
|
|
|
|
45.
|
ernesto rated this product
5 stars
Sat, March 04,2006:
The 2090's are back. Thanks Asics.
|
|
|
|
46.
|
Todd rated this product
5 stars
Thu, March 02,2006:
I tend to alternate between Mizuno and Asics - they both seem to deliver consistent product. The 2110 offers a perfect cucshioning/support blend and provide a "natural" running stride to boot, something I felt was somewhat lacking in previuos iterations. Great shoe.
|
|
|
|
47.
|
Srunner. rated this product
3 stars
Tue, February 21,2006:
rating was incorrect I can give 3 star to GT-2110 cushioning is always great..! but very wide more gt-2100 very wide uppper, very wide toebox more than gt-2100 very sloppy feeling..and heel height is lower than gt-2100 ..so slow feeling...this shoes is suitable about LONG-SLOW-RUNNING..
|
|
|
|
48.
|
Srunner rated this product
4 stars
Tue, February 21,2006:
a bit wide toebox and wide upper than 2100. heel fit is almost same....heel height is lower than GT-2100 Cushion feeling is same as well as GT-2100
|
|
|
|
49.
|
Mario Valdez Rdz rated this product
4 stars
Mon, February 06,2006:
Good enough for me...
|
|
|
|
50.
|
Todd Chipman rated this product
5 stars
Fri, February 03,2006:
This shoes is sturdy and very stable. It provides good cushioning and is light. After running several miles, the gel in the fore-foot is a HUGE relief. Highly recommend this shoe for most anyone.
|
|
|
|
51.
|
Tony Booth rated this product
1 star
Fri, January 27,2006:
Have used the ASIC 2xxx series for about 4 years now. First off, I fit perfect into a 12.5 with the 2090's, but with the 2110 it was too long and had to size down to a 12. Also, I need the posted sole or else I get shin splits, but going from the 2090 to the 2110, I developed shin splits within a few days. Since the 2090 is no longer available, I bought the 2100, and they seem ok, so far.
|
|
|
|
52.
|
alex rated this product
5 stars
Mon, January 23,2006:
I have been wearing Asics GT-2100 and these feel pretty much the same. I love this series so I have to give them 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
53.
|
acs rated this product
2 stars
Fri, January 20,2006:
I have been wearing Asics 2000 series for the last few years. I have wide feet, low arches and wear orthotics. I was pleased with more cushioning of 2110 compared to the last model, but it seemed that the toe box got narrower than 2100 - my toenails bruised in the outside of the foot which never happened before with previous models. I liked the width of 2100 better.
|
|
|
|
54.
|
mike rated this product
5 stars
Mon, January 16,2006:
If you like the 2090, you will like the 2110. Ran on several pairs of 2090's and was worried about the later models especially after reading everything about the 2100's. BUT no fears! The 2110 rocks. A bit roomy compared to the 2090's but feel very similiar. After 4 short and 1 long run (12 miles), no problems and am very happy with the purchase. Will be sure to buy a ton before the next model comes out.
|
|
|
|
55.
|
Lisa Kraus rated this product
5 stars
Sat, January 07,2006:
I was unsure whether to give these a shot or to buy 10 pairs of the GT2100s...I'm glad I took the chance, and I thought I'd write the review I wish I could've seen. I'm a small-to-medium frame, neutral runner (my foot doesn't roll inward or outward). I have a narrow heel, wide forefoot and high arch, which usually combines to create the feeling that my foot is "fighting" with shoes that are designed for more stability. Highly cushioned shoes always feel like they have a little too much room inside, like my foot is swimming in cushioning. The 2110s are like the 2100s in fit (nice and snug at the heel, plenty of space for my toes), I take the same size in both, and they are perfect. It feels like there is a touch more arch support in these (fine with me). These Asics have once again struck just the right balance between cushioning and stability. Huzzah!
|
|
|
|
56.
|
G rated this product
5 stars
Sat, December 31,2005:
definitely a 5
|
|
|
|
57.
|
Lizzy B. rated this product
5 stars
Wed, December 28,2005:
Excellent shoe! I've had no injuries after high mileage.
|
|
|
|
58.
|
Vinnie rated this product
5 stars
Tue, December 20,2005:
Just like the GT 2100,the GT 2110 has both great stability and cushioning.The fit and ride is exellent,very comfortable.Recomend+++
|
|
|
|
59.
|
STEVE212 rated this product
4 stars
Mon, December 19,2005:
I JUST WENT BACK TO RUNNING WITH ASICS,FROM RUNNING WITH NIKE SHOXS. I PUT ABOUT 4 TO 5 MILES A DAY ON AVERAGE; AND FOUND THE NEW GT2110 ARE PERFECT IN COMFORT AND STABILITY. I PURCHASE NEW SNEAKERS ABOUT EVERY 3-4 MONTHS;I WILL SURELY BUY ANOTHER PAIR OF THESE ASICS AS THEY ARE ABOUT THE BEST PAIR OF RUNNING SNEAKERS I'VE HAD IN QUIET AWHILE.
|
|
|
|
60.
|
kfoord rated this product
2 stars
Tue, November 29,2005:
I've been running in the Asics 2XXX series for several years, and have usually been pleased with each updated model. However, after 4 runs on my new 2110s, I've decided I will have to send them back. I've never sent shoes back before. It feels like the toe box is actually narrower, or maybe the shoe just fits a little bit smaller than before, or perhaps the changes to the forefoot have altered the way the shoe flexes in the toe box. But in any case, my three outer toes on each foot, as well as the balls of my feet, have been falling asleep/getting numb after a mile or so. I set out for an 8 mile run and had to stop after 4 miles because I could not feel my feet and I was worried about doing permanent damage! A run on the treadmill (usually a forgiving running surface) also caused the same problem. I will be ordering another pair of 2100s while they're still available and hoping the 2120s are better...
|
|
|
|
61.
|
slang rated this product
1 star
Sat, November 26,2005:
awful shoe!, i have in the past loved this series of shoes. i have wide feet and ordered the wide width. felt way narrow. had no room in the toe box and shoe hurt the ball of my left foot, i will have to send them back
|
|
|
|
62.
|
Brian rated this product
4 stars
Fri, November 18,2005:
Just rotated back to Asics after Mizunu Wave rider 8. These felt like they give back energy in every strike, even though I was running in 35 degrees. Love the big toe box, and set a recent PR first time out... Great update...
|
|
|
|
63.
|
richiebighorse rated this product
1 star
Thu, November 10,2005:
great shoe. just bought the 2110 and the saucony trigon guide and the saucony trigon guide blows it away. more cushioned in the forefoot and a smoother ride overall. great update from the trigon 2. one of my favorite saucony shoes ever.
|
