|
|
|
1.
|
AsicsRunner0001 rated this product
5 stars
Wed, January 13,2010:
RoadRunnerSports put this shoe in the "Classic" Category for a reason. It has withstood the test of time unlike its competitors.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Nightcore 2'01"30 PR rated this product
5 stars
Wed, January 13,2010:
only reason why i have a membership at this website - these shoes!!! you can't find them anywhere else. try, i dare ya.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Nathanael rated this product
5 stars
Wed, January 13,2010:
i am 130lbs, 5'5", and stability runner. of all the brands i have worn, none can compare (in my opinion) to the structure, durability - 500miles +, and cushion that the GT2110s give. this is the LAST quality shoe Asics makes in this line....period. please please please continue this tradition!
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Jim rated this product
1 star
Sat, January 09,2010:
The shoe fits me well, but they loose cushion after the first few runs. After the first few runs I could feel my knees and back aching. I was so disgusted I threw them out.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
bikexcountry rated this product
5 stars
Sat, January 02,2010:
I'm a lightweight runner - averaging between 55-70 mpw depending on my motivation, and though I used to switch from Mizuno Alchemy's to the 2110's, I've used these exclusively for the last 2 years. I have to say, this shoe is amazing. True, alchemy's feel more structured to begin with, but they're hard as a board and their support doesn't last. These shoes are really durable. They can last over 500 miles for me, and though they're not very light, the cushioning is superb - a real help on long road runs.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Terry B rated this product
4 stars
Sun, October 25,2009:
The last shoe in this line worth owning. 2120 too hard, 30 and 40 just as bad. Catch these on sale buy a few pair. I have worn out 4 pair of these and own 2 i run in now.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Longtime Runner rated this product
5 stars
Thu, October 22,2009:
I normally wouldn't write a review of a product I've purchased, but ASICS has hit a home run with this shoe and it's worth noting. As a runner for the last 30 years, I've tried a lot of shoes, from many manufacturers. Most stability and motion control shoes are clunky, hard and interfere with my natural gait. The GT-2110 is none of those things, and everything good. Great arch support, and phenomenal cushioning. This shoe encourages my natural gait, and the evidence is in the sound of my footfalls when I run on pavement - quiet. I don't know how they engineered this shoe, but I bought 3 pairs once I realized how good they were. 5 Stars.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Anonymous rated this product
4 stars
Tue, September 15,2009:
Best model in this line since the original GT-2010 which is still the best version in this line
|
|
|
|
9.
|
superRn rated this product
5 stars
Sun, August 16,2009:
Simplely great shoes because speva midsole is great( response, stable, strong , cushy)
but gt-2140 is like stone..
asics must give up solyte midsole.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Dave C. rated this product
5 stars
Tue, May 19,2009:
I agree...best shoe I've ever worn and I've raced cross country and all through high school. You put them on and you feel like going fast. Almost feels like a racing flat, but it's definitey a trainer. I am a huge Nike fan...but these are the best. I am thinking of getting a second pair just in case Asics stops making them.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
BIG FAN rated this product
5 stars
Fri, March 27,2009:
THE BEST SHOE I HAVE EVER WORN. PERIOD.
If Asics ever stops making this shoe I will cry.
|
|
|
|
12.
|
nightcore rated this product
5 stars
Mon, January 26,2009:
I am a huge fan of the ASICS 2110 shoe.
Been running in these shoes for about
4 yrs now. Tried the 2140, GEL series,
Brooks Adrenaline, and Mizuno Wave-Inspire. None can match the midsole or heel placement as well as
heel toe transitions. If ever this shoe
is discontinued, I will buy enough to
last me a good while.
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Marc Bryant rated this product
5 stars
Sun, November 16,2008:
I have been buying ASIC GT shoes for the last 8+ years since this winning line has consistantly supported me through numerous short runs and 3 marathons. As a new floor nurse, I have found that the GT has give me the best foot support and least discomfort when taking care of my patients during 12 hour shifts. Although my knees have recently put a crimp on my running I can still stay mobile via the great comfort and support offered by the GT line. Note that my favorite remains the GT2110's. Marc Bryant, Erie, PA
|
|
|
|
14.
|
On rated this product
5 stars
Mon, September 22,2008:
Newer isn't always better. Asics has taken this step recently with their new shoes. The GT-2110 was the last generation that was considered as a great running shoe. However, economics forced Asics to make a "newer" version so they can "charged" a higher price. When Roadrunnersports came out again with this running shoe as a classic, I immediately got 2 pairs. I must state it is the exact same running shoe that was the GT-2110. These shoes was selling out fast and they didn't have the size I wanted to re-order. I immediately purchase 3 more pairs as soon as they were in stock again on 9/15/2008. As long as Roadrunner still carry this shoe, I will never buy another different pair. That's how great these shoes are.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
tj rated this product
3 stars
Thu, September 11,2008:
too narrow rubbed my arches and gave me blisters. other than that a good shoe
|
|
|
|
16.
|
garrett rated this product
4 stars
Thu, July 03,2008:
These are some solid shoes. Ran 25 - 30 mpw in them for a couple years and never had any problems. I have the 2130s now. Not as good. The toe box is wider and the shoe seems longer. I'm about 6' and 175 lbs and enjoyed them. When they wear out they are hard on the knees and back, but that's the case for most shoes. Great buy, great shoe.
|
|
|
|
17.
|
MBH rated this product
1 star
Fri, June 27,2008:
Typically run in the Asics DS13s but needed a more cushioned stability shoe for longer runs. Hard to find a stability shoe WITHOUT a wide toebox (I need normal toebox). Ran in this shoe twice. Both times my heels hurt so bad I had to limp through 3 miles and cut my runs short. Still love the DS13s, but where did the good asics stability shoes go?
|
|
|
|
18.
|
etena lironman rated this product
5 stars
Fri, June 06,2008:
great impact absorber. have participated and completed two ironman events and this shoe gave no blisters. tried others but have come back to the 2110. does need inlays though 5stars
|
|
|
|
19.
|
mailman33 rated this product
5 stars
Tue, May 20,2008:
The 2110 is not stiff, so I was able to run in it w/o any problems right out of the box --- unusual for me. Great cushioning, support, and fit. I did have to go up 1/2 size.
|
|
|
|
20.
|
runninrye rated this product
5 stars
Thu, September 13,2007:
I have been running with the 2080's for a few years then switched to the Kayanos for a couple of years. Thought I would try the 2110 and have been pleased so far. I log about 45 mpw and they are holding up so far. Haven't ran a 16+ mile run yet but A+++ for Asics 2110
|
|
|
|
21.
|
sUPERRUNNER rated this product
5 stars
Sun, September 09,2007:
I agree with JOHN V
gt-2110 is best shoes that i had worn ever..
but gt-2120 is worst shoes..
gt-2120 is perfectly different with gt-2110....
solyte midsole is perfect mistake.
Asics must come back to speva./
Why does not asics know their mistake?
Many runner disappoint downgrade cushioning of gt-2120.
Asics must know their big mistake.
|
|
|
|
22.
|
John V rated this product
5 stars
Tue, July 17,2007:
I disagree with the people that say this is not a good shoe for distance. I ran five 1/2 marathons in these and they are easily the best shoes I have ever worn. The new 2120 are horrible shoes. I bought the wide and the still dig into my arches. The 2120 are cut so much more narrow it feels like a totaly different shoe.
|
|
|
|
23.
|
mynameis"Hammers" rated this product
5 stars
Wed, February 07,2007:
This was my very first running shoe, it was a good choice. I'm 15 years old 120 lbs and cuz of these shoes I ran a 16:47 5k!!!
|
|
|
|
24.
|
Jose Flores rated this product
4 stars
Sat, January 20,2007:
very confortable and good cushoning shoe
|
|
|
|
25.
|
Wade rated this product
5 stars
Thu, December 28,2006:
I have been Asics loyal for this past 10 years, and this is the best yet. Now I see that there are no more in my size. Bummer, I should have stocked up.
|
|
|
|
26.
|
beginner rated this product
5 stars
Mon, December 18,2006:
I do not run more than 5 miles a day. These shoes are great for quick three to 5 mile runs. I bought the kids shoe and it works great!!
|
|
|
|
27.
|
Jeff rated this product
3 stars
Mon, December 11,2006:
Good shoes, but feel a bit heavy - they feel heavier than the 12.5 oz advertized. Also, my second toe always gets a blister on the end, which I've never had in Nikes, New Balance or Brooks. Heel feels a little loose, but has caused no problems (no blisters anywhere but the second toe). Otherwise, though, has been a comfortable shoe for 5k's through half marathons. Very durable. I'm 6 ft, 220 lbs, medium arch.
|
|
|
|
28.
|
Ross rated this product
5 stars
Sun, December 10,2006:
I Love the feeling of these shoes!
The cushioning and the support is great to.
|
|
|
|
29.
|
Java Master rated this product
3 stars
Thu, November 30,2006:
An adequate shoe for smaller or average-sized runners, and only if you have no gait or fit issues. The insole is worthless, get new ones for better support and cush regardless of runner size. May be a tight fit for some orthotic users, test drive before buying! Buy 'em on sale only, not the best value at the regular price.
|
|
|
|
30.
|
MARTY rated this product
5 stars
Thu, November 23,2006:
This is my first runner and it will be my next runner as well.
|
|
|
|
31.
|
Craig rated this product
1 star
Tue, November 07,2006:
I agree with the previous review about the shoe's durability. I brought a brand new pair for a marathon and I was feeling the road by mile 18. It felt like I was running in an old pair of shoes; no responsiveness, energy return or cushioning at all. These shoes are definitely not for long runs or marathons.
|
|
|
|
32.
|
XCrunner rated this product
5 stars
Mon, November 06,2006:
A great update on the 2100. Same great responsiveness and stablilty. Comfy after 300 and still going! Lived up to XC season and trails.
|
|
|
|
33.
|
Steven rated this product
5 stars
Sat, November 04,2006:
This is by far the best running shoe I have ever run in. I have already bought two pairs and I am thinking of buying a third. THey have lasted me for a long time, and are still very comforatable.
|
|
|
|
34.
|
JoyRoseM rated this product
5 stars
Thu, November 02,2006:
I wrote a review that was removed. In fact, I see that most of the reviews of this shoe were removed, with only the most recent and most favorable left. What's up with the censorship guys? How are people supposed to make an informed decision if reviews are edited? My review was unfavorable because that was my experience. These shoes were not at all durable (the cushioning was dead in less than 3 months) and these did little to slow down my rate of pronation. I emphatically would NOT recommend these shoes to anyone. I suppose now that a new version (the GT-2120) is out you want to unload the GT-2110s you have in stock, but it shouldn't be at the expense of your customers.
|
|
|
|
35.
|
Thomas rated this product
5 stars
Wed, October 25,2006:
Great shoe in every aspect. I tried to move up to the Asics Cumulus VIII, but hated them and came back to the 2110 at half the price. Highly recommend this shoe to nearly any runner!
|
|
|
|
36.
|
Dan D. rated this product
5 stars
Tue, October 24,2006:
These are great training shoes for someone who needs a blend of cushioning and stability. I am on the heavy side (185 lbs.), with high arches, but I also have problems with pronation (don't believe those shoe guides that claim high arches underpronation -- I typically crush the medial-side midsole of most "cushioned" shoes after about 50 miles). The 2110's have worked pretty well for me. My only complaint would be that they don't seem to provide me with enough cushioning for long runs on paved surfaces. This isn't really a problem for me since about 95% of my running is done on unpaved surfaces.
I doubt if there is a shoe that would work better for me at this price. If I was running a lot on pavement, I would probably consider shelling out the extra bucks for a pair of Nike Air Max.
|
|
|
|
37.
|
Randy rated this product
5 stars
Sun, October 22,2006:
I've been using the 2000 series since I started marathoning 8 years ago. They always have a great ride and I don't have to go up in size like I do with other brands. Great cushioning, not heavy and even with my high weekly mileage, they last a long time. You can't go wrong with these shoes.
|
|
|
|
38.
|
Noel Sanchez rated this product
5 stars
Fri, October 20,2006:
They're just great overall. Very well cushioned and don't feel clunky or heavy.
|
|
|
|
39.
|
Daren rated this product
4 stars
Fri, October 13,2006:
Was planning on running my first marathon in these, but after a couple of long 18+ runs, these were not holding up, so I ran in the Kayanos. Still a great shoe, but my body needed more support.
|
|
|
|
40.
|
Neil rated this product
5 stars
Mon, October 09,2006:
I feel these are the best shoes to wear regardless of your foot-type. I think everyone needs arch support.
|
|
|
|
41.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Sat, September 30,2006:
Best shoe ever doesnt get dirty easy either
|
|
|
|
42.
|
Bob/La Canada, Ca. rated this product
5 stars
Tue, September 26,2006:
A great shoe comfy and stable. Ample width/room, I got D width, plenty roomy. My wife has worn 2100 series for a while and I got my first pair this year and have bought 2 more pairs in different colors!
|
