|
|
|
|
1.
|
Marty rated this product
4 stars
Mon, June 09,2008:
I upgraded from the 882. The 1062 didn't require any break-in period and the forefoot cushioning was better than the 882. So far- so good!
|
|
|
|
2.
|
oldmanand the sea rated this product
4 stars
Thu, May 29,2008:
wonderfully cushioned ride, especially in the fore-foot which many manufacturers neglect!! i am a mid to fore-foot striker so i appreciate this aspect; only downside is - as some have already mentioned - they tend toward the bulky side; overall i am happy with my switch from mizuno wave riders - af...
|
|
|
|
3.
|
William rated this product
1 star
Fri, May 23,2008:
Very comfortable but way too stiff in midsole -- gave me shin splints then a bad back when I changed my running style to compensate. They may be good for someone who likes the stiffness but a bust for me.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Bob rated this product
5 stars
Thu, May 08,2008:
I am a big guy and these shoes work great for me. They are durable with good cushioning. I have a lot of miles on them and they are still holding up well. Good value for what you get.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
26.2 rated this product
5 stars
Sat, May 03,2008:
These shoes have a great ride and feel a lot less bulky than some of the older model NB shoes I've tried. When doing Marathon training miles these shoes have a perfect amount of cushioning and not too much to feel spongy. Great shoe and made in the USA.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Sat, May 03,2008:
Experienced extreme discomfort in feet and ankles - had no alternative but to return the shoes.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Ryan P. rated this product
2 stars
Fri, May 02,2008:
After 250mi in these shoes my review is: Way to big, bulky, and heavy. I feel like I am running with lead tape in my shoes! In my long runs, I cannot help but wish they were not as big as moon boots.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
RunningMann rated this product
5 stars
Wed, April 16,2008:
had an injured calf from a previous run. Took a chance and ran with these shoes just two days after injury. At first, my calf felt a bit sore. But to my suprise it worked itself out after about 3/4 of a mile. I was able to run for 3.5 miles without any pain in my calf. These shoes really work f...
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Dave rated this product
4 stars
Sun, March 30,2008:
This shoe is just made too big. The heal and toe areas are just way too loose. I had an old pair of New Balance 1040s that I hated to part with. I did everything to try to find the equivalent pair. It seems like they have taken manufacturing short cuts so that the shoe does not conform as well t...
|
|
|
|
10.
|
CB rated this product
4 stars
Tue, March 25,2008:
Being a big runner ( 6'2" 235 lbs )with flat feet, these shoes are fine. They don't have as much cushion as the 1061, but they are more durable.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Anonymous rated this product
2 stars
Fri, March 21,2008:
After the first 6 miles my ankles were killing me. I thought it was due to the new shoes. 15 mile later I called the store and asked for an exchange.
Way to soft. My foot felt fine as the fit was perfect but my time was way down due to the discomfort.
|
|
|
|
12.
|
jeffrey rated this product
4 stars
Sun, March 02,2008:
I ran in these for a total of 6 miles before I ran a half marathon with no ill effects. Fit and cushioning are an improvement on the 1060, however the sole already has a bit of wear on it.
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Thu, February 21,2008:
terrible dead feeling shoe. heavy poor fitting and way too much cushioning.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Joachim rated this product
5 stars
Sun, February 17,2008:
Excellent Cushion Shoe. My weight 200 libs with high arches.
Heavier and more stable than 1060/1061. Have now only 100 Km on it, but it seems that they are more durable than earlier. The outsole has more gummi, so have a better grip. Best Use for the long slow distance. Good Feeling from the first ...
|
Customer Service
Your shopping cart is empty.
Fit Size: Buy this shoe 1/2 size up
