|
|
|
|
1.
|
Too hard rated this product
1 star
Wed, May 28,2008:
I ran once but my knees hurt so much. I will never run with them again. Period.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Eric G rated this product
1 star
Sun, May 25,2008:
I've been wearing Kayanos for years but decided to try these. I've used them twice. Eight mile run and a 6 mile run. My feet hurt!! I'm going back to Asics.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Joe Dizzle rated this product
5 stars
Mon, March 17,2008:
These shoes have done very well through the 100+ miles I have already put on them. They have good stability and cushioning, while staying fairly lightweight! I plan to use them in a 1/2 marathon coming up in a month, and look forward to them getting me across the finsih line!
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Robert rated this product
4 stars
Wed, February 06,2008:
Great shoe to train in for me at 5'9, 150#; currently running in second pair. Comfy and quite stable on my overpronating feet.I took away 1 star because the treads(bottoms) seem to wear out much faster than the rest of the shoe or any other shoe I've worn.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
hackleo rated this product
4 stars
Fri, February 01,2008:
Completed my first marathon in these, so I have lttle point of reference. Sever overpronator, 165lbs. With orthotics, I was able to manage ITB pain enough to finish training and the race. I put about 200 miles on them and they are still solid. Also used Cesium for training. These were much bett...
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Bob rated this product
5 stars
Tue, January 08,2008:
Really happy with them, bought 3 pairs. I'm a narrow width and they fit well and like the stability. Best Nikes I've ever owned. Got 400 miles on first pair, I'm 5'9" and weigh 154.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Ren rated this product
2 stars
Sun, December 30,2007:
These shoes are hard, heavy, stiff and uncomfortable. Other than that, they're great.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Mattman-NJ rated this product
3 stars
Sat, December 29,2007:
At 5-7, 140 I found the cushioning in this shoe to be awful. Loved the AST 9's and felt they were a much softer ride. Just called to return these for the new AST 11's hoping the cushioning will be improved. Definitely a step down from the AST 9.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Kane II rated this product
5 stars
Mon, December 17,2007:
Just rolled 375 miles in 'em. Best shoe I've ever had, period. Great cushioning and support, and have held up amazingly well for the beating I've given them. Sole is still in very good shape. Left heel air bubble blew out this weekend. At 6'1 190 lbs, I can't believe they held up so long. I b...
|
|
|
|
10.
|
AZ rated this product
5 stars
Thu, November 29,2007:
these shoes are great! i love the firm cusioning. i generally have a hard time finding running shoes that fit. i have a long skinny foot (13 D) that is too wide for most narrow shoes but too skinny for most regular width shoes. these fit my foot perfectly because they aren't designed with the ty...
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Jesse rated this product
4 stars
Sun, November 18,2007:
Decent shoe. I wish they kept the soft midsole and the lower to the ground profile as the AST 9. It seems that every brand is making their shoes stiff anymore to cater to our overwweight socoity. Being a 120 lb male runner the 9'd were nice and lasted 600 miles. These things may last 2000 miles if I...
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Woody rated this product
5 stars
Wed, October 03,2007:
Way to go Nike! I have become a devoted wearer of the Structure Series. My previous pair of shoes was the Structure 9's, which were the one of the best pair of shoes I have ever had. Now the Structure 10's are even better. I am 5'10", 165 lbs and struggled for years with stress fractures and pai...
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Tom D rated this product
3 stars
Thu, September 27,2007:
This is a decent stability shoe but lacks any real cushioning. I use it for speed work but can't use it for long runs (>10miles) without feeling abused. Decent endurance, not Nike's best.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
sammy rated this product
2 stars
Mon, September 24,2007:
I rate it a two only because I did not actually die in these shoes. For the first time ever I experience sever knee pain, tired and sore ankels and all this after only going about 5 miles. Should have never left my asiscs. Very dissapointed.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
obese runner rated this product
1 star
Sun, September 16,2007:
im as big as seabiscuit and these shoes still suck!!!
|
|
|
|
16.
|
John rated this product
1 star
Fri, September 14,2007:
Instead of improving, Nike ruined this new version. The cushioning in the heel is awful compared to the Triax 9.
I has poor heel to toe transition. This shoe might be good if you are an obese runner.
|
|
|
|
17.
|
SuperRunner rated this product
5 stars
Thu, September 13,2007:
very good shoes for long distance mileage ..
a few bulky feel but Support , Stability , cushioning is great!..
I'm gt-2110 and kayano 10, 11 wearer.
but gt-2120 is trash ( solyte midsole is very stiff.asics's big mistake.).
I must find gt-2110 alternate..
finally , I have find gt-2110 alt...
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Federico Puma rated this product
5 stars
Mon, September 03,2007:
Great shoe, but the AST 9 was a lot better and was not as stiff as this one was. If you can try Nike AST 9 first, I would recommend.
|
|
|
|
19.
|
JGG rated this product
4 stars
Sat, September 01,2007:
I'm a bigger runner and the AST has worked fine for me so far-50 miles on one pair. It is stiffer (some would say clunky), not as responsive and feels higher off the ground than prior versions. For those who liked the AST 9, you should check out the new span 4, which has gotten very good reviews on ...
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Motivated USMC rated this product
5 stars
Sat, August 25,2007:
shin splints and knees problems used to be a repeating problem until i bought this shoe... the support is excellent and the shock absorbsion is up to par. i like the way it seems to keep my feet flat and on track with the ground.
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Bill Martin rated this product
1 star
Mon, August 06,2007:
I've been running in Nike's for over 30 years, I have seen a constant regression downward of their products, ie.... shoes in particular. I went from the Triax series of shoes, to the Vomero's. Ever since I ran in the Triax series 9 shoes I've had chronic tendinitis in both ankles and now in my left ...
|
|
|
|
22.
|
YP Bos rated this product
2 stars
Sun, August 05,2007:
I have worn only the Structure Triax for 10 years and after 15 pairs over the years have lost count. I'm 5'9", 160lbs and fairly flat and wide feet and do well in stability shoes. The No. 9 was the best of them that I'd had...I was breaking my previous PRs time after time. I've honestly given the...
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Kane rated this product
5 stars
Tue, July 31,2007:
Bought this shoe in January '07, and have logged 203 miles in them since. Great fit and cushioning. Although labeled a "stability" shoe, it isn't nearly as rigid as many I have tried that fall into that category. Set PR's in 5k and 10k this year, and have been injury free all year (knock on wood)...
|
|
|
|
24.
|
Mike rated this product
1 star
Sat, July 28,2007:
I've run 14 marathons, and I put in 60 miles a week to train. I've always stuck by Nike, but this shoe is horrible! I developed calf pain from them (never had before) and they are just extremely uncomfortable. After trying these shoe for a full use of 220 miles, I tried a pair of the Triax 9 that I ...
|
|
|
|
25.
|
bk nyc rated this product
3 stars
Fri, July 20,2007:
Great feeling shoe out of the box...but the midfood cushion wears out very fast. I would suggest these for high shool athletes who are on a budget and are running on a variety of surfaces. High milage on the New York City roads beat the midsoles and the forefoot of sole up. I only got bout 150 mile...
|
|
See all reviews
|
Customer Service
Your shopping cart is empty.
Fit Size: Buy this shoe 1/2 size up
