|
|
|
|
1.
|
Bernie P rated this product
5 stars
Thu, April 17,2008:
Excellent shoe. My left foot was crushed in a car accident so I have issues with shoes. Walk all around 4 Disney parks in 4 days with no pain. All I have to say. Cushion is great.
|
|
|
2.
|
PST rated this product
5 stars
Thu, April 17,2008:
I am heavier than most runners(225 lbs). I ran 8 miles out of the box with these...Seems to have much more cusion than the 10 did. Great shoe for me.
|
|
|
3.
|
adp rated this product
2 stars
Wed, April 16,2008:
this shoe gave me the worst shin splints after 2 miles--the shoe has great feel, but sacrifices the nice ride of the triax 9. i really wish i had more triax 9's lying around...
|
|
|
4.
|
SoundMind rated this product
5 stars
Tue, April 01,2008:
My friend told me Nike was back. I tried this one - first Nike in 5 years. It's perfect.
|
|
|
5.
|
kimdawg rated this product
5 stars
Sun, March 30,2008:
Nike finally fixed the most glaring problem with the Air Structure Triax shoes. The clunky, wooden-like ride is gone without sacrificing support. I actually enjoying running in the Structure Triax+ 11.
|
|
|
6.
|
john rated this product
1 star
Mon, March 24,2008:
The cushioning in the forefoot is fine; however, the heel feels like a brick. 1.25 miles into my run on asphalt, I had to stop due to severe pain on my right heel. This new version is as hard on the heels as the Triax 10. Luckily I still have 3 pairs left of the Triax 9 which have the right amount ...
|
|
|
7.
|
RunDog rated this product
5 stars
Fri, March 14,2008:
Even better than the Structure 10. Looks like Nike finally figured out how to evolve shoes one year to the next. Stick to the plan and I will follow.
|
|
|
8.
|
lakerunr rated this product
3 stars
Tue, March 11,2008:
The toebox is too constricting, even in EE. The forefoot is too stiff and inflexible. I found it too controlling. Gave me severe shin splints.
|
|
|
9.
|
Philip rated this product
4 stars
Wed, March 05,2008:
A good fit for my feet and just enough cushioning, too. Other then the sizing (I'm wearing a 13 in this shoe?) I'm very satisfied and will be buying another pair in the future.
|
|
|
10.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Tue, February 26,2008:
like a rock.
|
|
|
11.
|
socalrunner rated this product
2 stars
Wed, February 20,2008:
felt good at the start, nice stability - but 4 miles in or so feet fell asleep...maybe too snug a fit, but the air bladder just doesn't work for me...
|
|
|
12.
|
SoCalRunnin rated this product
5 stars
Wed, February 06,2008:
Lighter.just the softness You go Nike.
|
|
|
13.
|
Tommy rated this product
5 stars
Wed, February 06,2008:
2 years in a row Nike gives me a good shoe. Nice work.
|
|
|
14.
|
Rick rated this product
5 stars
Sun, February 03,2008:
I love the feel of this new Structure. It has a great transition from heel to fore foot without feeling like the typical brick stability shoe. It also offers a greater level of support than any other shoe I have tried on. Thanks I love the shoe!
|
|
|
15.
|
Henry rated this product
5 stars
Fri, February 01,2008:
I give ST+11 5 stars because of its great comfort and stability. I have been wearing size 11.5EE Structure Triax since it was placed on the market. I have never understood Nike's sizing scheme because with the ST+11 I couldn't even get a size 11.5EE on my foot. I tried a 12 and a 12.5 and finally s...
|
|
|
16.
|
Luke rated this product
1 star
Wed, January 30,2008:
Switched to these from Pegasus. Wore Size 12 1/2D in Pegasus. Same size in these are too small and much too narrow widthwise. Cannot understand why the sizing difference with various Nike shoes. Quality control problems in China? Priceless!!!
|
|
|
17.
|
Fritz rated this product
4 stars
Fri, January 25,2008:
Was a big fan of the St10. They finally got rid of that bulky toe. This new one fits as well as the 10. Congrats to Nike for not screwing it up. I'm buying 2 pair.
|
|
|
18.
|
Oddfellows Track Club rated this product
4 stars
Fri, January 25,2008:
Ran in Equalon 1 in Chicago 07. Did fine. Bought Equalon 2 and it hurt me. AST11 seems to work well for me. Seems more stable than EQ2 and with a higher arch. Looks good so far.
|
|
|
19.
|
Joe rated this product
1 star
Fri, January 25,2008:
too heavy and bulky. The shoe feels like a brick. I would've given this shoe zero stars if I could. Please bring back the structure triax 2.
|
|
|
20.
|
Bernie P. rated this product
5 stars
Wed, January 16,2008:
Finally, a Nike stability shoe in widths. I'm a 15 4E 6'4" 235lb guy, and I find a lot of the current offerings from other running shoe companies are subpar. NB 858 has a massive toebox (too big) and the 1010 is too stiff asics have no cushioning as of late, and brooks durability is not too good. ...
|
|
|
21.
|
220lbs Man rated this product
5 stars
Wed, January 09,2008:
To be honest, I am on my 6th pair of Triax and I find the new ones very good, though I have only done about 120miles on them. I carry a large amount of weight and run about 35miles per week. They are solid and a tad lighter than the 10's but not as much as I hoped. Definitely the best model so far i...
|
|
|
22.
|
stabilityMan rated this product
3 stars
Wed, January 09,2008:
this shoes is bulky feel as AST10?
I wish that this shoes is not bulky one.
Please give me some review.
I can't find this shoes review anywhere.
|