|
|
|
1.
|
Jon rated this product
5 stars
Mon, January 11,2010:
I went with the reviewers suggestion and ordered one size smaller and they fit great. I would definitely buy these again.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Agree rated this product
4 stars
Wed, January 06,2010:
for what it is, this works for me. I do like it smaller for support.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Mike from NY rated this product
3 stars
Wed, December 30,2009:
No chafing, but could offer more support. I agree with the one review that suggested you buy one size smaller. Could also use a wind panel like the old RRS briefs I still have and have used for years.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
AAA rated this product
2 stars
Sat, October 31,2009:
Buy at least one size smaller then you need
|
|
|
|
5.
|
clint from wyoming rated this product
5 stars
Wed, October 21,2009:
Best I ever had.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Thu, June 18,2009:
very comfortable and breathable. no chafing at all. great underwear to run in, best I've ever had.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
mohammed s,ubansu rated this product
5 stars
Tue, March 24,2009:
handle it with acare
|
|
|
|
8.
|
davisBarefootRunner rated this product
4 stars
Sun, February 15,2009:
These are great to wear under tights, cycling shorts, or even just thermal underwear when it gets cold. The underwear are the only part that gets sweaty and smelly anyway, so you can minimize what you need to wash. They breathe well, also.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Chris Alexander rated this product
5 stars
Sat, January 10,2009:
Extremely comfortable. Good 'hold' without feeling too tight or constraining. I use them for running and working out. Will definitely be ordering more. I haven't had the problems with the elastic others have referenced.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Bex Boyd rated this product
4 stars
Fri, March 14,2008:
These were exactly what I was looking for to wear under my running pants in cold weather. I am not a fan of jocks and was looking for something similar to the liners in my running shorts. So far, so good. The only issue is the elastic on the inner leg tends to creep up every now and then, more so than my running shorts.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
lonnie Dailey rated this product
4 stars
Fri, January 04,2008:
It is time to buy another pair of RRS briefs. I have worn them in training and races and love the RRS briefs. Never had any problems with the briefs and am buying them again
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Svan rated this product
4 stars
Thu, July 19,2007:
I had a pair of Brooks Runderwear that I've probably run 2000 miles in, and they're finally coming apart.
I was able to get three pair of these for the same price as ONE Runderwear.
So far, they are just as comfortable and provide similar support. I'll have to see how long they last.
|
|
|
|
13.
|
DavisRunner rated this product
4 stars
Sat, January 20,2007:
I forgot to mention my complaints. The elastic on the inner leg portion could be a bit tighter for better support. The rear of the underwear could be remedied if they weren't so loose there.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
DavisRunner rated this product
4 stars
Sat, January 20,2007:
These are the only such items I have tried so I can't compare them with others. However they are cheap and work a lot better than underwear under running or biking tights in the cold, or even under thermal underwear for every day cold weather use. It makes such things much more comfortable (no sweaty crotch). These are the cheapest too.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
N rated this product
3 stars
Mon, November 27,2006:
For running, these briefs are good, but not great. I would prefer a windbrief or the cool jock under a pair of running shorts. However, for light impact activities, like golf and aerobics, these briefs work well for that. I also find them comfortable for everyday underwear also. They feel good under a pair of nice slacks.
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Jon rated this product
3 stars
Fri, July 15,2005:
These are not as comfortable as the Dryroad jock. They don't allow as much freedom of movement as I like around the leg bands.
|
Free Shipping! (limited time only) Welcome to the World's Largest Running Store! You're Guaranteed to Feel Great Shopping with Us.
Your Cart is empty
