|
|
|
Men's
RRS DRYROAD Brief 3pk
Item #RRM462
Superior Wicking Performance Underwear.
Ultra light DRYROAD®/Lycra® knit wicks moisture. Wider mesh in the support pouch increases breathability. Soft, durable waistband. Covered leg openings prevent chafing.
Men's
RRS DRYROAD Brief 3pk
Item #RRM462
| RRS Men's Sizing | | Size | S | M | L | XL | XXL | | Chest | 36-38 | 38-40 | 41-43 | 44-46 | 47-49 | Waist | 30-32 | 32-34 | 35-37 | 38-40 | 41-43 | Sleeve | 32½ | 33½ | 34½ | 35½ | 36½ | Inseam | 30 | 31 | 32 | 32½ | 33 |
Men's
RRS DRYROAD Brief 3pk
Item #RRM462
|
8 Runners have reviewed this product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Bex Boyd rated this product
4 stars
Fri, March 14,2008:
These were exactly what I was looking for to wear under my running pants in cold weather. I am not a fan of jocks and was looking for something similar to the liners in my running shorts. So far, so good. The only issue is the elastic on the inner leg tends to creep up every now and then, more so...
|
|
|
2.
|
lonnie Dailey rated this product
4 stars
Fri, January 04,2008:
It is time to buy another pair of RRS briefs. I have worn them in training and races and love the RRS briefs. Never had any problems with the briefs and am buying them again
|
|
|
3.
|
Svan rated this product
4 stars
Thu, July 19,2007:
I had a pair of Brooks Runderwear that I've probably run 2000 miles in, and they're finally coming apart.
I was able to get three pair of these for the same price as ONE Runderwear.
So far, they are just as comfortable and provide similar support. I'll have to see how long they last.
|
|
|
4.
|
DavisRunner rated this product
4 stars
Sat, January 20,2007:
I forgot to mention my complaints. The elastic on the inner leg portion could be a bit tighter for better support. The rear of the underwear could be remedied if they weren't so loose there.
|
|
|
5.
|
DavisRunner rated this product
4 stars
Sat, January 20,2007:
These are the only such items I have tried so I can't compare them with others. However they are cheap and work a lot better than underwear under running or biking tights in the cold, or even under thermal underwear for every day cold weather use. It makes such things much more comfortable (no swea...
|
|
|
6.
|
N rated this product
3 stars
Mon, November 27,2006:
For running, these briefs are good, but not great. I would prefer a windbrief or the cool jock under a pair of running shorts. However, for light impact activities, like golf and aerobics, these briefs work well for that. I also find them comfortable for everyday underwear also. They feel good under...
|
|
|
7.
|
Carey rated this product
1 star
Mon, November 06,2006:
Elastic waist band started unraveling within three months plus the sizing is inconsistent among the three briefs. Overall I would judge the quality as poor.
|
|
|
8.
|
Jon rated this product
3 stars
Fri, July 15,2005:
These are not as comfortable as the Dryroad jock. They don't allow as much freedom of movement as I like around the leg bands.
|
|
 |
|
| You May Also Like |
|
|
 |
|