|
|
|
Men's
RRS 7" Stamina Plus Baggy Short
Item #RRM909
Men's 7" STAMINA PLUS BAGGY SHORT :: Throw on these high-performing running shorts that give you the casual comfort you need. Stow essentials in the side pockets and back zip pocket. Stay cool and comfortable with brief liner and intense wicking fabric. Reflective logo. 7" inseam. DRYROAD®
Men's
RRS 7" Stamina Plus Baggy Short
Item #RRM909
| RRS Men's Sizing | | Size | S | M | L | XL | XXL | | Chest | 36-38 | 38-40 | 41-43 | 44-46 | 47-49 | Waist | 30-32 | 32-34 | 35-37 | 38-40 | 41-43 | Sleeve | 32½ | 33½ | 34½ | 35½ | 36½ | Inseam | 30 | 31 | 32 | 32½ | 33 |
Men's
RRS 7" Stamina Plus Baggy Short
Item #RRM909
|
12 Runners have reviewed this product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Mike rated this product
5 stars
Thu, October 09,2008:
Overall a great running short. Its a good length- not too long or short. Great price.
|
|
|
2.
|
Alan Misaki rated this product
3 stars
Thu, April 24,2008:
Great shorts. I don't use for running but for going places. Negatives: side pockets are stitched in a way that contents fall out when sitting. Also, rear pocket is just a little too narrow to accommodate a wallet. Overall, however, love these shorts.
|
|
|
3.
|
tjl rated this product
3 stars
Sat, November 17,2007:
No problem with the comfort. Now, pockets are useful if you are actually running to go somewhere (where you may need your stuff), as opposed to just running. However, the front pockets should be deeper, or have zippers, so that stuff in them does not fall out so easily. The back pocket is about t...
|
|
|
4.
|
James rated this product
1 star
Mon, October 22,2007:
These shorts are too long and too baggy. And what's with all the pockets? I'm looking for running apparel, which is why I have always shopped your website. I suppose these shorts are fine for playground basketball, tennis or going to the Quik Stop Market, but they aren't running shorts. Bring back y...
|
|
|
5.
|
cotten rated this product
5 stars
Sun, July 22,2007:
I guess I don't use the pockets, so I'd defer to others on that. What I do know is that these are some darn light, comfortable shorts at a great price. I'm back on the website to buy more.
|
|
|
6.
|
Robert rated this product
2 stars
Tue, June 12,2007:
I agree with previous review. The legs are tighter, the seat is tighter, the front pockets are small and the back pocket isn't wide enough to hold an average wallet if you need it. Not a good replacement for the old baggy short. I do like the new material, just not made as well.
|
|
|
7.
|
Mike M. rated this product
3 stars
Fri, June 01,2007:
I have been a big fan of this short - great fit, and deep pockets. My most recent purchase was an XXL (as were my previous purchases) and I was surprised that the shorts were a tad bit snug even though I have dropped 20 lbs. The pockets are anything but deep. The newest version of this short falls s...
|
|
|
8.
|
nick rated this product
5 stars
Mon, May 28,2007:
a wow short, fits precise nice and dry
|
|
|
9.
|
Jim rated this product
5 stars
Thu, May 24,2007:
Great short, very comfortable, easy movement. This is my favorite short for the gym.
|
|
|
10.
|
Arbitro rated this product
5 stars
Thu, May 24,2007:
These shorts offer flexibility, dry quickly, and the zippered rear pocket is great for holding items while running or at the gym.
|
|
|
11.
|
bob rated this product
5 stars
Mon, April 09,2007:
great short. comfy.
|
|
|
12.
|
wilsongk rated this product
1 star
Fri, April 06,2007:
I've run in the old stamina plus for years. Love them. These run a waist size too small. I'm normally a 33-34 so the mediums should fit according to the sizing chart. They are too tight. I'm sending them back and probably won't chance the next size up as they will surely be too large or baggy.
|
|
 |
|
| You May Also Like |
|
|
 |
|