|
|
|
1.
|
Anonymous rated this product
5 stars
Tue, November 24,2009:
Fantastic shoe! I use it for all of my workouts ranging about 90 miles/week. I'm 180lbs and supinate moderately but this shoe still lasts well.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Wed, November 11,2009:
replacing this shoe with the triumph 7 which is even worse. Time to put this line to rest saucony.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Sat, October 24,2009:
Is it true they are discontinuing the Triumph? Does anyone know what are they replacing it with?
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Dado_run rated this product
5 stars
Sun, July 26,2009:
Excellent shoe with a lot of cushion. I was addicted to Mizuno Rider from 2005 but after trying the Triumph I change to them (this is the 2nd pair in 3 months). I really appreciated the lacing system that I suggest for people with high arch feet (like me).
|
|
|
|
5.
|
jbs rated this product
5 stars
Tue, July 21,2009:
great shoe, comfy, long lasting, for a clydesdale like myself, even take it off road. I thought I was a Asics man until I tried these 4, 5 now the 6. I buy two pair for longer wear.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
jt rated this product
5 stars
Tue, July 14,2009:
i bought these about week ago , they r ready to go right out of box , and buy your 1/2 size up , sizing is perfect and much better cushioning then asics , try 'em u will like
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Rock rated this product
5 stars
Sat, July 11,2009:
(continued from previous review) ...just as comfortable and have never experienced any heel slippage, toe issues, or any of the other problems previous reviewers have mentioned. I'm a lighter runner (140 lbs, 35-50 mpw) and certainly can't comment on the cushioning properties for a clydesdale; however, for me, the Triumph 6 has been a winner (soft, flexible and responsive, albeit a bit expensive).
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Rock rated this product
5 stars
Sat, July 11,2009:
It's really amusing to read reviews from people who either haven't worn the shoe, or only have a handful of runs in them. Isn't the purpose of these reviews to comment on one's experiences and to help guide those comtemplating a purchase? Regardless, I'm on my second pair of the T6 and think it's a well-cushioned, durable and versatile shoe. I put over 420 miles on my first pair before I started feeling any discomfort, which is a record for me. I was a big fan of the Triumph 4 (went through 4 pairs of them), but only got 280-340 miles out of them. Quite honestly, these are less clunky than the T4 (which I tended to wear mainly on long runs). This shoe works well for me on both longer runs (12-20 miles) and tempo efforts. It really is a great everyday shoe. Yes, the fit is a bit different than earlier iterations (I wear a 9.5 in the T6 and wore a 9 in the T4), but I find this shoe just as comfortable and have never experienced any heel slippage, toe issues, or any of the other p
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Erich rated this product
4 stars
Sun, July 05,2009:
Have the shoes for about 2 weeks and have done a few 5k's in them and they are not as comfortable as the 5's. The toe box is a little small but that is my only complaint.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Steven rated this product
5 stars
Thu, July 02,2009:
I would think that they would make this shoe in a 2E. The Nimbus and Vomero both do.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Mike rated this product
5 stars
Mon, June 29,2009:
Does anyone know what Saucony's release schedule might be for the 7? I'm also a loyal wearer but willing to wait. From what it looks like, it might not be until late fall. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
12.
|
David rated this product
2 stars
Thu, June 25,2009:
Horrible shoe. Traded them in for the Nimbus 11. I'll never go back.
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Eric rated this product
5 stars
Tue, June 23,2009:
Love the laces, good cushioning, fit my feet well.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Fri, June 12,2009:
Terrible shoe for heavy runners. The cushion is gone after just a few light runs. Saucony should go back to the T4 design.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
big dog rated this product
1 star
Sun, May 31,2009:
this shoe is awful. fit is way too tight. instant knee pain. if you are under 100lbs and have bird feet maybe you will like this piece of crap.
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Henry rated this product
2 stars
Sat, May 30,2009:
Triumph 4 was great, I have 4 pairs of it but I won´t buy any pair of T´5 or 6(actually an inferior shoe), once my shoes wear out I will switch to a different brand
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Jeff rated this product
3 stars
Fri, May 29,2009:
This is the first saucony I have ever purchased. I took them home and ran around my apartment once and wanted to take them back. It is a super comfortable shoe, but they don't hold your heel at all. I felt like I was going to step out of them with every stride. I would not recommend them if you like a secure feeling shoe.
|
|
|
|
18.
|
swimbikerun rated this product
3 stars
Sat, May 09,2009:
With Version 6, gone is the snugger feel of the previous Version 5. The shoe fits sloppy and I'm forced to switch over to the adistar Ride which is a good shoe but wears out twice as fast as the Triumph. And I'm a midfoot striker 5'9" only 140 lbs.
|
|
|
|
19.
|
CT rated this product
2 stars
Tue, May 05,2009:
I really dislike these shoes. The Triumph 5 had a much tighter heel so your foot wouldn't slip out of the shoe. These are so bad I've actually had the shoe slip completely off my foot. I miss the snug heel.
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Dave rated this product
5 stars
Fri, April 24,2009:
best shoe i have had. great cushioning and very cumfortable.i will be buying a second pair
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Sauce rated this product
4 stars
Thu, April 23,2009:
Beav check out the ASICS Nimbus 11 for more cushioning and stabler platform. Do not know your weight but at a size 14, T6's sound like they are probably not protecting you enough..good luck!
|
|
|
|
22.
|
Beav rated this product
2 stars
Wed, April 22,2009:
I read the previous 4 and 5 star reviews and can only guess that these shoes have poor quality control - they're all over the place! I wear a size 14, medium(D)width, and have a very high arch. These shoes don't come close to having enough support to be rated a "neutral" and the toe box leaves my foot swimming in it. I feel like I'm wearing a triple E! These are the first pair of Saucony's I've owned, my wife did all the ordering and had to send back once for a bigger size. I didn't want to hurt her feelings by telling her how frustrated I am by the fit. So far the durability seems good so I'll give it a 2 star, but seriously doubt I'll buy another pair no matter how big the hype.
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Sauce rated this product
4 stars
Tue, April 14,2009:
This shoe fit like a glove! Could it use more cushioning for heavier or higher mileage runners, perhaps, but it is designed as a LIGHTWEIGHT trainer...right? I recall back in the day when ADIDAS Marathon's were all the rage...Need more cushioning on the mid or forefoot then get the Jazz, the Ride, even the Nimbus 10. But if you want a nice heel & mid-foot fit, efficient transitions and quick step weight, the Triumph delivers IMHO...I echo the point on the previous review no shoe will make everyone happy. If it fits and feels good...buy it.
|
|
|
|
24.
|
makesmelaugh rated this product
3 stars
Mon, April 06,2009:
Nothing will make everyone happy but you all seem to have the answers, whenever I need a good laugh I just listen to you guys complain about shoes. the 4s, 5s, 6s...I've had multiple pairs of each (well, just one pair of 6s) and gotten over 500 miles on every one of them. there are differences but they are all good shoes.
|
|
|
|
25.
|
paul rated this product
2 stars
Sat, April 04,2009:
Triumph 4 was awesome so once they were worn out I came back to the Triumph only to find a completely different and inferior show...the Triumph 6. More narrow, smaller toe box, less cushion, stiffer sole.
|
|
|
|
26.
|
ido26point2 rated this product
3 stars
Mon, March 23,2009:
You guys are preaching to the choir.
The Triumph 4 was a great shoe, I had 4 pairs. I got the 5 and they were shot when I got to 100 miles. Unacceptable.
I'm don't know whether or not to give the 6 a shot or keep going in the Nimbus 10's. Wake up Saucony, and bring back the things that made the 4 great.
|
|
|
|
27.
|
john rated this product
5 stars
Tue, February 24,2009:
great shoe..more cushioning than the triumph 5 and i prefer the toe box as well
|
|
|
|
28.
|
Jim rated this product
1 star
Sun, January 18,2009:
ran in tri5 and loved the freedom of the toebox. Then Saucony did what everybody does, fixed it when it wasn't broken...too much upper crap in the forefoot. Just finished 14 miles and have second black toe from this model (had none from 5's and ran 1 marathon and several 1/2's and loads of other runs/races with no black toes.
|
|
|
|
29.
|
seabiscuit rated this product
5 stars
Thu, January 15,2009:
great cushioning, smooth ride, very responsive for this 200lb horse.
|
|
|
|
30.
|
Chet rated this product
5 stars
Sun, January 04,2009:
I am 510, 195lbs and run about 15 miles per week. I have put about 50miles on this shoe. Very happy with the Tri6. I have owned the Tri4 and Tri5 and this model is the best. It has the perfect blend of cushion and responsiveness. The shoe seems to mold to your foot. Excellent shoe, very happy with it.
|
|
|
|
31.
|
tridork rated this product
5 stars
Tue, December 30,2008:
This my first pair of Saucony shoes. I got them to train for a half marathon, and they have allowed my mileage to increase without the pain I had been experiencing in my Mizunos. Really responsive for amount of cush involved. Great shoes. 6'4" 245 lbs and these have been great for the first 100 miles.
|
|
|
|
32.
|
ralph029 rated this product
5 stars
Mon, December 29,2008:
Minimal shoe that works WITH my foot. Did not try to force my foot to do unnatural movements. Plenty of cushion, but not so much as to remove the feel of the road. Plenty of toe box room.
|
|
|
|
33.
|
Walt rated this product
3 stars
Mon, December 29,2008:
I hope Saucony reads these reviews; and not just RoadRunner customers. This review is a bit ahead of the game in that I loved the Progrid Triumph 4 -- bought four of them -- but when the Triumph 5 came out and I bought it, the 5 was a major disappointment; going "backward" in every way. So, I'm "reviewing" the 6 without wearing it, based on comments from the other reviews by Bob and the rest..I'M WAITING FOR THE PROGRID TRIUMPH 7...AND HAVE NO INTENTION OF BUYING THE 6. PLEASE GET IT RIGHT, AND RETURN TO THE VIRTUES OF THE 4; THE BEST SHOE I'VE EVER WORN!!!!
|
|
|
|
34.
|
Bob rated this product
3 stars
Thu, December 18,2008:
Loved the Triumph 4's. I'm an older runner, and loved the fit and cushioning. The 6's fit great, but the cushion is not close to the 4's. The same as the reviews of the 5's. Hope the 7's get it right again.
|
|
|
|
35.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Thu, December 11,2008:
pure crap. no cushioning and the forefoot is to narrow. what happened to this model saucony?
|
|
|
|
36.
|
PJ rated this product
2 stars
Mon, December 08,2008:
Very poor cushioning in the forefoot. Heel cushioning was fine. Not a very sturdy shoe, and it seems like it would not be very durable. Minimal use would seemingly trash this shoe in about 3 or 4 weeks. Lightweight and breathable, and fit like a slipper. Unfortunately it also felt like a slipper (poor cushioning) when running in them.
|
|
|
|
37.
|
mike rated this product
5 stars
Fri, November 28,2008:
i'm 5'11, 170pds. high arch. enjoyed nike's, but the triumph 5, and now, 6, has edge on them. even better than the 5 series. feels lighter, more natural, and a bit more spring in each step. the memory foam soul really conforms to my foot. feels funny the first mile, but great there after. most of my runs are 3-7miles, but looking to increase. this is the sneaker to take me there.
|
|
|
|
38.
|
tallrun rated this product
5 stars
Fri, November 21,2008:
I'm 6'6", 200 lb, under pronator, and run 40-45 miles per week (long runs to 20 mi). I was a huge fan of the progrid 4, but hated the progrid 5 so much I went to the PI syncrofloat. That shoe was too soft and was worn out by 145 miles. The progrid 6 is similar to the 4, but slightly firmer and seems to have a wider toe box. I've got about 100 miles on them and the soles are holding up well.
|
|
|
|
39.
|
Chad rated this product
4 stars
Sat, November 08,2008:
I Bought a pair of Progrid 5's and after 50 miles of trying to break them in I was unhappy with their fit. The store told me to come in and pickout anything. As a loyal saucony wearer I went with the 6's that had just arrived.
These shoes are great. My long runs are approxamately 7-10 miles and I have no pain what so ever. The extra cushion helped significantly.
|
Free Shipping! (limited time only) Welcome to the World's Largest Running Store! You're Guaranteed to Feel Great Shopping with Us.
Your Cart is empty
