|
|
|
1.
|
michael rated this product
4 stars
Wed, January 27,2010:
I have no reference, these are my first ever stability shoes. All I know is that my shin splints are gone my knee pain progressively decreased and i went from run/walk 2-3 miles 4 times a week to running 4-6 miles 4 times a week (6'2 210). However, last night (probably 200 or so miles in) I think the support totally blew and i'm seriously hurting today. Also had blister issues on longer runs (>4 miles). I'm thinking of switching to the equalon now, but I have to say for the first 150-200 miles these were great...and way cheaper. If they lasted longer before breaking down I would have rated higher but the break-down happened very rapidly over a coupdl of weeks after months of great runs.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Keith rated this product
5 stars
Sun, January 10,2010:
I have now gone through 4 pairs of this shoe and love it. I am 5'10 and 155 pounds and averaged about 60 miles a week in this shoe. Great stability and secure feel on your foot. I hope the 13's are just as good.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Bruce rated this product
5 stars
Wed, December 23,2009:
This is a great shoe for flat surfaces or trails. I put 30-40 miles on a week and rotate this shoe with others and has held up well.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
RAN THORNTON rated this product
5 stars
Wed, December 16,2009:
This shoe is the one I have been needing great stability and support.I am going to buy this in the trail vertion as well.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
FloriGarf rated this product
3 stars
Tue, December 08,2009:
For a "stability" shoe, they have surprisingly little stability. No side structure. I am large (6'4" 235) and put a beating on shoes (60 - 70 miles per week) and you can literally come out of these if you are not on flat terrain. Also promotes ankle roll, which as we all know, sucks.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
John rated this product
5 stars
Sun, November 15,2009:
Ran a marathon in them, they did a great job. No blisters, no problems, will definately buy another pair. I am 6'00 200 pounds.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
birdy rated this product
1 star
Sun, November 08,2009:
dreadful.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Kyle rated this product
5 stars
Wed, October 21,2009:
Great shoe! Best i have found in a long time.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Norman rated this product
5 stars
Thu, October 15,2009:
Just getting back into running and have only worn them for a short time. They are comfortable. I was worried about buying half a size larger than normal, as advised on the website, but they fit perfect.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Brian rated this product
3 stars
Wed, September 30,2009:
I would not recommend these shoes for someone who has more weight. I am around 220, I tried these after using Vomero 3. After two runs i had the worst shin splints i have ever had, and felt as though i had no cushioning. I have switched back to the Vomero's. The difference is night and day. Probably a good shoe for a lighter runner
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Anonymous rated this product
1 star
Wed, September 09,2009:
I have been running for many years and decided to try Nike again. They were very comfortable initially but by the time I had 50-75 miles on them I began having heel pain to the point I have problems walking the next day. I have always used "stability" shoes. Never again!!!
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Frient rated this product
5 stars
Mon, August 24,2009:
I started running in Triax+ 11s and loved them. These feel just as good. I'm 5' 10", 170-175lbs. The fact that they run small is perfect since normally a 10.5 feels to small and an 11 too roomy. Great shoe!
|
|
|
|
13.
|
JRHorn rated this product
1 star
Sun, August 16,2009:
I ran in the "Nike Zoom Structure Triax+ 11" shoes and they were great. My issue is shin splints in my left leg, and never had a problem with shin splints with the Structure Triax series. I bought what I thought were the successor shoes to the 11s, but by looking at the shoe itself, i can't tell if it's the Structure Triax 12; it only says "Structure 12" on the shoe and does not say "Triax" anywhere. Whatever - my shin splints returned almost instantly when i started running in these shoes. The other day, i ran in my old worn Structure Triax 11s, and experienced no pain. I'm wondering if RR provided me the shoes that i ordered?????
|
|
|
|
14.
|
SuperRn rated this product
5 stars
Sun, August 16,2009:
more better than gt-2140, great shoes.
super responsive, good support & stability, forefoot cushion is good , fit is awesome.!.like custom shoes.
great choice for moderate overpronator.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
William rated this product
5 stars
Thu, August 13,2009:
These shoes are excellent so far. I bought 3 pairs of the same shoe. I weigh 220 and am 6'3", so stability plus was the recommended shoe, but I don't run the distances indicated. This is a stability shoe and should last me a good long while. I prefer a conservative design for my shoes and this shoe fit the bill perfectly.
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Anonymous rated this product
3 stars
Mon, August 03,2009:
I used to think that these were great but recently i had two pair go flat after 200+ miles, then the replacements were like two different shoes even thought the only difference was color
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Go Hokies rated this product
5 stars
Sat, August 01,2009:
I am 5"-10" and 150. Flat and narrow feet. Wear custom orthotics. Have had problems with stress fractures so I went from Brooks Addictions (worn to take care of shin splints) to Nike Triax+12. I have not had any problems at all with stress fractures or shin splints. I have actually had much less aches and pains with these than any other shoe. I am going to stay with this for the forseeable future.
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Tom rated this product
5 stars
Sat, August 01,2009:
Ordered these yesterday afternoon, and I got them today around 3pm. Thanks RR for the fast shipping as I couldn't wait to slip these beauties on my feet. I'm recovering from a broken leg, and knee surgery last week, and they feel so great when I walk. They are so great right out of the box, and I haven't taken them off yet. These give me the cushion I need, but more important, the stability. I didn't want squishy shoes while using crutches, or even taking a few steps without them. I highly recomment these to anyhone, but especially for someone who is in the same situation as I am. Great customer service by RR.
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Joe Lugiano rated this product
4 stars
Sun, July 26,2009:
I find the AST 12 to be a snug fitting shoe. I have used them in runs up to 4 hrs. comfortably. I've used the AST 11 and found them also snug fitting as compared to the AST 10 which I thought was the best of all the AST shoes I've used over the last 30 years.
|
|
|
|
20.
|
KimDawg rated this product
4 stars
Tue, July 21,2009:
These shoes are good, but not as good as the Structure Triax 11. The 11's upper is much more comfortable. The 11's fit in the forefoot is superior to the 12's. Another issue with the 12 is that you can feel the laces on the top of your foot. Otherwise, the sole and mid-sole seem identical. I hope Nike goes back to the 11's upper material and fit in the next version.
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Jonathon rated this product
4 stars
Mon, July 20,2009:
I loved the Triax 11, but this shoe doesn't seem as comfortable. The forefoot doesn't seem to have as much cushion. These are still nice shoes, however I'm not convinced these are built for my long (15-20 mile) weekend runs.
|
|
|
|
22.
|
Greg rated this product
4 stars
Sun, July 05,2009:
I have enjoyed Nike Triax for years, but this update is disappointing. The initial fit is good, but there seems to be less cushioning for a less comfortable ride. I may look for other shoes in the near future.
|
|
|
|
23.
|
jim rated this product
4 stars
Sat, June 27,2009:
Very good right out of the box. I am on my third and fourth pairs. good cushioning and great for the low mileage runs I do.Only quirk , at the end of their life the heels go flat suddenly
|
|
|
|
24.
|
erico rated this product
3 stars
Sun, May 17,2009:
Comfortable shoe and great for short runs. The forefoot is very stiff without any cushion so I would not recommend for heavy runners or those running a marathon.
|
|
|
|
25.
|
JBOV rated this product
5 stars
Mon, May 11,2009:
Very good combination of cushioning and support. Not overly heavy for the amount of control. Excellent forefoot cushioning. I ran in the 8's and these are very reminiscent of those.
|
|
|
|
26.
|
Sergio S rated this product
3 stars
Tue, April 21,2009:
This shoe is extremely light and comfortable. Great support and cushioning at the heel. However, I am 200 lbs and every time I go over 5 miles, the ball of my feet start hurting. I don¿t have this problem with my other shoes and would not recommend it unless you are running short distances.
|
|
|
|
27.
|
Jeff rated this product
5 stars
Wed, April 08,2009:
I only run in Nikes (my one experiment w/ Asics was horrible) and I have run in the Structure for years. This version is no different. Great support, great cushion, and fabulous durability.
|
|
|
|
28.
|
oldmanrunner rated this product
4 stars
Mon, March 23,2009:
My criticism of the 12s compared with the 11s is that the 11s had a piece of leather on the tongue where the laces grip the top of the foot but the 12s have only a thin piece of cloth. After about 10 miles you can really feel the laces digging into your foot.
|
|
|
|
29.
|
DerbyRunner rated this product
5 stars
Fri, March 13,2009:
1st pair of Nikes, been running Brooks for about 5 years. Very very happy with this shoe. Put about 30 miles on them.
|
|
|
|
30.
|
CJ rated this product
5 stars
Sat, March 07,2009:
Why have so many people given terrible reviews but yet haven't even bought or run in the shoe?????????????
|
|
|
|
31.
|
alan rated this product
1 star
Sat, February 28,2009:
Too clunky and slow. The shoe to get is the Nike Air Span 6+. Only wish RRS would carry it. Too bad. They are missing out by not offering this shoe. It's the best shoe I have worn in over 10 years. It's super smooth, supportive, light, flexible and has a teriffic ride. Reminisent of the old pegs from the 1990s. A true gem!!!
|
|
|
|
32.
|
Old Guy rated this product
4 stars
Mon, February 16,2009:
I have not yet purchased these, but tried on a pair. Interestingly, the recent Runners World testing scale indicated that the cushioning in the heel area was softer than the 11's. The forefoot was one of the softest in the testing. I have not worn the 11's, but I have the winter version and they are very firm, too much so for pavement, only trails. The 12's seemed to fit me well, but without running in them, I can't say much about the stability or cushioning. I like the Equalon 2's which I have run for about 150 miles. I plan to watch the ratings and I may try the 12's eventually.
|
|
|
|
33.
|
james rated this product
5 stars
Fri, February 06,2009:
I have had these for awhile now, and really cannot tell the difference from the 11. Smooth ride , great fit right out of the box. I am 165, agree a heavier runner would want a shoe like the equalon
|
|
|
|
34.
|
Joe Lugiano rated this product
2 stars
Tue, February 03,2009:
I find both the AST 11 & 12 to be tighter with a lower and narrower toe box than than the AST 10. Not very suitable if you are a medium sized runner who runs longer distances (20+ miles).
|
|
|
|
35.
|
dogrunner rated this product
3 stars
Wed, January 21,2009:
Haven't run in 12+'s yet; still have 2 pair of 11s to get through. However, I can say that Nike needs to strive for better quality control within a product line. The blue/silver 11+s fit completely different from the gray/white/yellow model, which is slightly more narrow with less cushioning up front. I'm betting that the different color lines were made at different facilities. Could be the same thing between 11s and 12s...different factories mean different fit. In my experience, the only brand that was ALWAYS the same between color schemes was Mizuno.
|
|
|
|
36.
|
Joseph rated this product
4 stars
Wed, January 21,2009:
I can also confirm that only minor cosmetic changes have been made. If you liked the 11 (and I did), you'll like the 12.
|
|
|
|
37.
|
Mike rated this product
4 stars
Wed, January 14,2009:
I ran extensively with the Triax 11 over the last year. I have a brand new pair of 11's as well as brand new pair of 12's in my rotation. There are only a few very small cosmetic differences visible between the 11 and the 12. Running I can not feel any difference whatsoever between the 11 and the 12. They feel exactly the same to me in terms of cushioning and support. The sole, medial post and crash pad are exactly the same between the 11 and the 12
|
|
|
|
38.
|
James rated this product
5 stars
Sun, January 11,2009:
Today right out of the box 1.75 miles. Can't tell the difference from the 11's / more support?
|
|
|
|
39.
|
Joseph rated this product
3 stars
Mon, January 05,2009:
Why all the negative reviews so far? All I've read is that the only update from the 11 is a cosmetic one. Is that not the case?
|
|
|
|
40.
|
pegasusluvr rated this product
5 stars
Thu, January 01,2009:
ow...
really bad cushioning in the toe area, but heels okay i guess
|
|
|
|
41.
|
F_THIS rated this product
1 star
Thu, January 01,2009:
not so good support.
thatsalll ihave too say.
|
|
|
|
42.
|
nikeloverrrrrrrrrrrrr4267 rated this product
1 star
Thu, January 01,2009:
terrible cushioning deal nike, what happened?
these are worse than the pegasus series...
|
|
|
|
43.
|
triax11lvr rated this product
1 star
Mon, December 29,2008:
bring back the plus 11's!
please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
44.
|
kenyansrule rated this product
4 stars
Mon, December 29,2008:
its an ok shoe overall, except i ran with the plus 11's and my feet got used to them.
plus 12's are kind of weak in cushionn and it feel sort of heavy and draggy.
|
|
|
|
45.
|
Sprinter469 rated this product
3 stars
Mon, December 29,2008:
I partially agree, the plus 11's were much better than the plus 12's.
Not enough cushioning.
Nike completely removed all the cushioning in the toe and the heel is too springy.
Nice try Nike, maybe next time in the plus 13's..
|
|
|
|
46.
|
XC Runner rated this product
1 star
Mon, December 29,2008:
I prefer the triax 11's from 2008. Plus 12's are far too heavy, and not enough cushioning...
|
